It’s all made from our data, anyway, so it should be ours to use as we want

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t think it should be a “punishment.” It should be done on principal.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Not sure making their LLMs public domain would really hurt their principal, their secret sauce is in the code around the model.

      And yes, I do recognize that you meant “principle”.

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        That’s not true though. The models themselves are hella intensive to train. We already have open source programs to run LLMs at home, but they are limited to smaller open-weights models. Having a full ChatGPT model that can be run by any service provider or home server enthusiast would be a boon. It would certainly make my research more effective.

          • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            58 seconds ago

            I know, I have used them. It’s actually my job to do research with those kinds of models. They aren’t nearly as powerful as current OpenAI’s GPT-4o or their latest models.