• aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      1 year ago

      After my Russian wife was browsing the internal news yesterday to see what level of information is provided over there she mentioned that their solution in the abortion debate is to have everyone give birth, and just give up the kids to be raised by the state if you don’t want them.

      Also there seems to be a proposal to exclude women from higher education unless they’ve given birth.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wow, that’s wild. This will likely lead to women claiming/diagnosed to be infertile needing to have sex with the principal to enter higher schools.

      • Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also there seems to be a proposal to exclude women from higher education unless they’ve given birth.

        Being forced to give birth to a child is very effectively excluding you from higher education(at least if you take care of it).

      • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        lso there seems to be a proposal to exclude women from higher education unless they’ve given birth.

        Would they not be required for the skilled workforce?

      • Cinner@lemmy.worldB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        my Russian wife was browsing the internal news yesterday to see what level of information is provided over there

        How do you do that? Or is your wife one of those “Russian brides” that you pay but they never actually come to you?

        (I’m just joking… I hope… I am actually curious how to read internal Russian news. I have a couple VPS in Moscow.)

        • aard@kyu.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am actually curious how to read internal Russian news.

          Internet?

            • aard@kyu.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              There is news for internal consumption, and news for a global audience. Both is available via internet nowadays - there’s pretty much no local newspaper without internet presence nowadays.

    • palal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      JFC all the guy said is that people convicted of minor charges should be released, and if they’re released they’ll have babies because they’re, y’know, not in prison.

      How much of a hard on does Lemmy have for keeping prison populations high?

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure it’s already considered one if you’re in the Russian army in Ukraine.

    • palal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

       A member of the Russian State Duma has proposed releasing women convicted of minor charges from prisons so they can conceive

      Did anyone even read the article?

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you mean Russia, because the Republicans in the US seem to be marching to the very same tune?

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      nah, prison baby factories and lower the conscription age

      also, not having babies is now illegal

  • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That reminds me. Anyone here ever hear about the bureaucratized rape in West Virginia coal mining camps back in the day? If a man was injured and couldn’t work his wife could take “Esau scrip” which she would have to pay back with her body. Capitalism! The entire situation is a stark reminder that capitalists wil LITERALLY rape and murder you to protect their position.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Somehow that topic didn’t come up in 7th grade WV History class. Going to have to dig into that as it would make a great post.

      Edit: JFC, I had no idea this happened. And I live here and have toured the Whipple Company Store (again, in 7th grade).

      https://wvpublic.org/what-was-the-esau-scrip/

      “We’ve had multitudes of women and tell us as little girls they remember their mothers coming to the company store and one of the things that a lot of more the lovely ladies had to do was come upstairs. Some of the young girls had the stories shared by their mothers stating that they would be escorted in the shoe room. There would be a selected guard that would be waiting for them and they would receive a brand new pair of shoes with no accountability other than to perform whatever the service the guard wished to have in lieu of pay. We had one woman in particular share with us that her mother was a young girl about 25 years old and bought her first pair of shoes here and the women’s entire life those shoes remained in the shoe box on her closet shelf never to be worn and she refused to wear another pair of shoes her entire life. She made her shoes out of cardboard, newspapers and twine.”

      - Joy Lynn, owner and tour guide, Whipple Company Store

      • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, they don’t teach a lot of things in school. I only know about it because of BtB. The whole episode on The Battle of Blair Mountain is nuts and shows how far the owner class will go to keep people in line.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, they don’t teach a lot of things in school

          And current politicians are making it so many other important topics aren’t being taught.

          I’m looking at you Florida and Texas…

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          BtB just did a separate story on the Hawk’s Nest disaster in West Virginia in which they killed thousands of men by knowingly giving them silicosis and covered the whole thing up.

    • alienanimals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regardless of the economic system, people in power will rape and murder to maintain their position of authority.

      • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wonderful argument. In case you’re gonna say “I’m a capitalist” no. You’re capital.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    These fears over population collapse are the weirdest form of mass hysteria I’ve ever seen.

    • quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Population collapse for the human race isn’t so much a problem, we’ll weather through it as a species. For an economy, population decline is very not good though. You need working age people to support the young and old, as well as everything else your taxes go to.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is that demographic collapse can and almost certainly will have devastating economic consequences for the countries facing it.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol invade Ukraine after promising not to. Getting entire generations of sperm makers killed in illegal war. Force female prisoners to be baby factories. Ladies and gentlemen: the bad guys.

    • Argonne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Force male prisoners into the meat grinder and force women prisoners to give birth. Birth from who…? Such massive dystopia in Russia. What a shame.

      • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like somethings that needs a steady stream of new convicts and flexible legislation that can be wielded to that purpose. Just like with US corporate correctional system. I think they can manage it.

    • palal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

       A member of the Russian State Duma has proposed releasing women convicted of minor charges from prisons so they can conceive

      Literally nobody here has read the article and it shows

  • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Prisons in russia are starting to look like revolving doors. Women get out if they choose to give birth, men if they choose to throw themselves into the meat grinder.

  • snoopfrog@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds much easier than creating a society where people feel happy and secure enough to have families. I wonder when 45 will add this to his campaign checklist.

  • creamed_eels@toast.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The plans included funding for new mothers and not just “maternity capital” for families with two or more children, in addition to welfare benefits for low-income families and free school meals for a four-year period.

    Hey regressives! You love Russia so much, why don’t we follow their example?

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never thought that Russia would become the Republic of Gilead, but I suppose they want to excel at something.

    • palal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

       A member of the Russian State Duma has proposed releasing women convicted of minor charges from prisons so they can conceive

      Can you people at least read the article?

      • dreamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seriously, this is one of the biggest things that we do not need to come over from Reddit.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ‘Fall rather than decrease’ wtf? And it’s a good thing for there to be less people, there are too many in the world anyway.

    The fantasy of infinite growth seems to include people as well to capitalists, and as I already mentioned, it’s a fantasy.

            • thrawn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not saying this about you specifically cause the other person did it too but I miss when the internet sourced claims instead of just being like “no that’s wrong” with zero elaboration or evidence. Very few people are convinced by “nah not true” and nothing else

              • bratosch@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, you are right. And I agree. Although in my defence, he made the initial claim without further evidence.

                Anywho, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), an agency operating under the UN, has done plenty of research and published papers about this.

                The conundrum lies in that while we need more effective food production, we also want everything to be grown naturally (without fertilizer and/or free range livestock etc.), which is ineffective.

                We need more land for crops and animals to feed more people, but we also need more space to house those same people, meanwhile we cannot continue deforestation.

                On top of those, soil needs time to replenish all the nutrients. If it’s not given that opportunity, it WILL become permanently unusable.

                There’s simply too many conflicting wants and needs that are strictly incompatible.

                • otp@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So are you suggesting that there would be enough resources to go around if we didn’t want organic food and huge single-family houses for homes?

            • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              We currently produce more than enough food and clothes for every person on this planet and could easily house them all.

              The problem is that because of capitalism we can’t get what everyone needs to them because it might hurt someone’s profits.

              • angrystego@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, but even if we used the resources better, we would still come to a limit, just later. Eternal population growth is nonsense.

                • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  With proper logistics that becomes less of a problem when coupled with universal education and healthcare.

              • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                this is the reality no one wants to admit because it points out a major flaw in the human psyche… that is, the ability to lack empathy by distance. the farther away people are, the less we care about them.

                this is obvious is every facet of our daily existence, and is provable by the lack of dense conservative centers and how easily swayed those brought physically close to those remote entities (mentally or physically) become empathetic.

                humans suck, and we are the cause of resources not going where they are needed.

              • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                We have also destroyed most of the wild ecosystems of the world to grow that food.

      • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Infinite growth is inherently incompatible with life. It does not work. The biosphere is under immense pressure already. Humanity extinct 4 species every day and has killed off 90% of wild animals in the last 100 years. Nature is the greatest repository of knowledge that we have. It is invaluable to our science, though we treat it as expendable. It’s like burning all libraries. We are simply using too much land in an effort to support a shitty economical model that is based on population growth, forever. This is the kind of problem that humanity has proven to be ineffectual at solving. Long term and noone will take action unless it blows up in their faces, personally, right now. Let the next generation deal with it. That is what they said in the 50s and that is what they will say in 10 years too. The damage done to the biosphere is practically permanent. Once an animal or plant is extinct, it is gone. Once enough of them is gone, the planet no longer supports complex life.

        • Lmaydev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          We don’t need to be using resources the way we do. It’s again a result of consumerism.

          We could easily support a way bigger population if we used resources better.

          If we stopped worrying about money so much science would easily be able to fix many of these problems.