• pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    but at 1% of the cost, why are we still talking about nuclear

    Sure… the reactor will go 24/7 (between maintenance and refuelling down times, and will use less land

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      The land thing isn’t anywhere near enough of a concern for me, especially when dual uses of land are quite feasible.

      24/7 is just about over commissioning and having storage. Build 10x as much and store what you generate. At those sorts of levels even an overcast day generates.