• Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Good for you. History disagrees with your disagreeing.

      Look up Malcom X, the Black Panthers, and the Battle of Blair Mountain sometime. Pretty much every victory oppressed groups have won has had to draw blood in order to win the day.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The pairing of the open palm and the raised fist often is very successful. The violent side creates the conditions for victory and the nonviolent side creates the conditions for peace. Without the threat of violence no pressure is applied, but without the peaceful people the oppressors have nobody they’re willing to settle with.

        The labor wars ended with afl-cio dominance for a reason.

      • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If I may hijack this discussion, I find that quite interesting what you are saying! I’m currently see myself getting more radicalised by the weak reaction of our (German) Government towards the rising fascists.

        Pretty much every victory oppressed groups have won has had to draw blood in order to win the day.

        Where and how do you Differentiate between legit violent Protest and Terrorism? Is ist just the agreement with the one side but not the other?

        Because, If I may go there, even Hitler claimed that Germans were being oppressed in Poland and Czechoslovakia.