Sources & relevant Wikipedia articles: 2023 in science. Stay up to date with the latest major studies.
I also integrate most of the studies into Wikipedia; finding, editing & selection take most of the time, not the image. Monthly newsletter is here (I don’t know if it still sends the mails properly).
I used to put all the sources here; here’s the sources for only the six main items:
- https://www.mdpi.com/2571-550X/6/3/46
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01793-3
- https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000181
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06557-9
- https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(23)00174-2/fulltext
- https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
What are the six main entries?
Am i really supposed to click 6 unlabeled urls looking for one thing i want from a list of 10 things? I mean thanks for trying, but pretty useless.
There’s a better way to phrase this.
But it’s true, proper citations shouldn’t be much of a stretch from what he’s already doing. Presumably none of this is off the top of his head.
Not for this one, of course, but it’d be nice to see going forward.
Maybe it could be designed as front and back of a card as two images. In some places the second image could be included as a comment.
They are sorted by order of appearance; it’s just 4 links and the two additional ones are the short items of the tile’s image.