• vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I’m not sure if you’re kidding, so I’ll just note that Finland and Iceland are NATO member states, and Finland is notoriously against Russian aggressions due to history.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think the commentor meant in regard to US restrictions that may get imposed on a project, since they have odd ITAR/EAR controls. Moving sonewhere with less export restrictions could alter choices of development.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Kernel cannot follow or not follow any legal rules. Linux Foundation can.

      And if regulations become a serious issue and go against the spirit of open-source, it is time to move the Foundation somewhere else.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        i don’t know what exactly was in question in the kernel, that the lawyers had to worry about, but From EAR rules… “note that open source software can still be subject to export control measures if it includes technologies or functionalities that are regulated. In such cases, specific controls may be applied to prevent the unauthorized export of these technologies or functionalities.”

        IF something was deemed controlled, it makes sense to pull it so kernel can ship anywhere, and whomever received it can do their own tweaks

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        the foundation should have moved long ago but I think Linus’ personal adoration of the US is going to get in the way of that.