• Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why people think it’s necessary. Does Firefox display ads? Blender? GNU/Linux operating system? VLC video player?

    No offense, but I think maybe you are so used to corporations trying to drain your money that you don’t notice how much amazing software we are using that was built for free. And this software is often better than the commercial competition (for example it took Microsoft 10-15 years to add workspaces to Windows and tabs to file explorer after they were added in GNU/Linux and it took them over 20 years to add a package manager).

    Not only was that software made for free, but it also gives users freedom unlike (usually) the commercial alternatives.

    • 𝓣𝓞𝓑𝓘𝓝@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something that makes forums a bit different is that it costs the owners when people use the website. Unlike Blender, Firefox, Linux, etc… A server host can’t just make the forum available, then set and forget it, they either have to pay a huge fee to some host like AWS, or have a huge stockpile of computers in their basement.

      • Fylkir@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How do you think Blender, Firefox, Linux, etc, are distributed? Probably get more requests per day than any single Lemmy instance does.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Back in 2008 I met a bunch of the VLC devs at a KDE related open source software conference. They talked about their experiences getting approached by companies with “fuck you” levels of money with offers they couldn’t refuse – and yet refused. In 2008 it was about bundling spyware with installers, largely. I always admired their stalwart refusal to bend.

      Side note: this was shortly after they’d completed their transition to Qt as their toolkit. They stole their little volume control widget from KDE’s media player, Amarok. The beauty of open-source and cross pollenation. I expect Lemmy and kbin and others in the fediverse will freely cross pollenate too. In the end, open source wins.

    • rms1990@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is that it’s a hosted platform. This might an issue and if making it a pay only service doesn’t come around, ads will. If that happens I’m outta here.

    • funkyb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is you cited software projects, not hosted infrastructure. A person can contribute to a FOSS dev project and not incur expenses dependent on end-users activity. Hosting a fediverse application isn’t like that, somebody has to pay for the hosting and the hosting expenses will scale with user activity.

      • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The projects I mentioned weren’t made for profit, but they are now so important that they are funded from donations. Both from users and corporate sponsors. With that money they are able to hire full-time developers. So they still cost our society money, but no ads or spyware is required. I think hosting could work the same way.