• 7fb2adfb45bafcc01c80@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    how do you expect an archive to happen if they are not allowed to archive while it is still up.

    I don’t want them publishing their archive while it’s up. If they archive but don’t republish while the site exists then there’s less damage.

    I support the concept of archiving and screenshotting. I have my own linkwarden server set up and I use it all the time.

    But I don’t republish anything that I archive because that dilutes the value of the original creator.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      A couple of good examples are lifehacker.com and lifehack.org. Both sites used to have excellent content. The sites are still up and running, but the first one has turned into a collection of listicles and the second is an ad for an “AI-powered life coach”. All of that old content is gone and is only accessible through the Internet Archive.

      In fact, many domains never shut down, they just change owners or change direction.