First time this happens to me. With a German protonvpn server.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    YouTube doesn’t like VPNs. Harder to track you (and sell/monetize your data) if they can’t tell who you are.

    • Skvlp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      I desperately want a viable alternative to come along. There’s a lot of great content on YouTube, but the platform is increasingly being enshitified.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            There’s nothing “disgusting” about nudity. You should shake off those preconceived cultural biases, you’ll be a better person.

      • pathief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a gigantic money sink, it’s going to be extremely hard to come up with a profitable (or break even) alternative.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree. We just haven’t gotten to the point quite yet. Where the creators revolt. But that stage should appear somewhat shortly.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Youtube does a ton of evil stuff, but this one is more tame. I suspect the VPN was used to bot and got banned, so the sign-in is required to better target where the traffic is allowed to go, instead of blanket banning everybody using the service.

        • kbal@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I suspect the VPN was used to bot

          There are plenty of sources, including even in this thread, indicating that that this is not the problem. Quit making excuses for them.

            • kbal@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s not just you. I’m tired of the whole team of people who are always standing by to bring out similar excuses any time someone decides that in their quest to stop invidious from existing — or whatever google is actually aiming at — it’s acceptable to just mass-block all the VPN users as collateral damage.

              • Peffse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                It’s not an excuse though. It’s right there in the error message.

                Where are people getting the impression I think google is some kind of saint who can do no wrong? I don’t even see the “proof” that is being used to say I’m coming to google’s defense. Just a few anecdotal theories… just like I provided.

                • kbal@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Ah, so it’s not you coming up with the stupid excuse that they have legit reasons to think the user might be a nefarious “bot”, you’re just passing along the stupid excuse as you interpret it from the meaningless message direct from Google. That explains where you got the idea that “viewbots” had anything to do with it, I guess.

                  • Peffse@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Yikes. I’m here for a civil discussion, so if you don’t want to discuss this with me and instead just want to attack me because you think I’m on the opposing team… well, I guess that’s what the block list is for.

                    I wish you luck in life.

          • Peffse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Bot can automate views. It’s why Youtube keeps trying to move towards “engagement”. Comments, likes, etc, all require an account, which is an extra hurdle for bots.

      • hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Third party app without an account maybe? Freetube on the desktop and newpipe on the phone is what I like to use. There’s stuff like grayjay, tubearchivist, and pinchflat as well. Or just go straight yt-dlp.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re on Android use NewPipe and it’s forks, personally I prefer Tubular and PipePipe.

      Periodically YouTube will break, but both of those forks, as well as new pipe prime, update fairly quickly.

      GrayJay it’s interesting. It has different feel and feature set than newpipe, but it’s worth using. I will say I get more login errors with GrayJay, but closing the app and reopening it resolves it.

      All the piped apps will be in f-droid/droidify, you can download GrayJay directly, or just scan the QR to add the repo to a FOSS repo manager.