• RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Lack of successful alternatives? It’s easy to find flaws with capitalism but every other system has its share of problems too.

    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      People will find ways to accrue wealth and power even if you change the rules of the game. Sometimes people on this platform make it sound like socialism or communism can solve our problems. but it’s not that simple.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Socialism is the successful successor to Capitalism. Socialism isn’t an idea you implement, but a consequence of markets coalescing into monopolist syndicates that make themselves ripe for public ownership and planning.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          What do you disagree with here? The idea that markets trend towards monopolist syndicates, naturally centralizing production? Or the idea that the Proletariat should sieze these syndicates and plan production democratically and centrally?

          • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’m not really disagreeing with you to be honest. I’m only saying that your views are the central idea of Marxism. Only Marxists believe in the conflict theory. I’m not a Marxist, but i do think socialism is the next most likely economic stage considering the current capitalist landscape. Whether it is the best path is what i don’t know.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I’m a Marxist-Leninist, correct, but the point of Marxism is that it doesn’t matter what individuals believe, Capitalism itself paves the way for Socialism just like Feudalism paved the way for Capitalism.

              • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Hmm i don’t know about that. Saying that this one theory explains social change is kinda restrictive. There are other valid ideas that aren’t the conflict theory that might also result in social change. Think of idealist theories such as Hegel’s dialectical process which involves a thesis and antithesis. These theses eventually contradict each other to form a synthesis which eventually becomes its own thesis and vice versa.

                I just like to keep an open mind about this stuff, as i don’t think social change boils down to just one theory.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Marx has the best content on the topic, shit is so good it triggers daddy owners to this lol

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I would say I like some dead guy… But his work is foundational for any self respecting adult imho

              With out Understanding these concepts you are ain’t fucking operating

              Also, elites study him closely and a lot of the regime behavior is actually designed to suppress workers based on his writings.

              Ohh the irony.