• Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The Mozilla foundation also granted some money to ente a company that offers Google photos replacement with end to end encryption.

  • disguised_doge@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    crazy how as soon as mozilla does good stuff nobody is there

    We’re all glad to see Mozilla have a win, at least I assume so. But there’s been a lot of other much bigger decisions that have gone on recently that make us (at least me) hesitant to celebrate at the first good thing.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      Yeah it’s like the fucking Goat thing. Mozilla fucked a goat and shocked that that’s all people remember.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yes and no, total cookie protection prevents cookies from loading from other sites, CHIPS is a new standard that makes it so that that is impossible* to begin with. (simpifying here but thats the idea)

      *unless the browser allows it

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        my impression was that it was impossible already, because there was effectively a different cookie storage for every site

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 hours ago

          oh

          https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Privacy/Privacy_sandbox/Partitioned_cookies

          CHIPS is similar to the state partitioning mechanism implemented by Firefox. The difference is that state partitioning partitions cookie storage and retrieval into separate cookie jars for each top-level site, without a mechanism to allow opt-in to third-party cookies if desired. As browsers start to phase out third-party cookie usage, there are still valid, non-tracking uses of third-party cookies that need to be permitted while developers begin to handle this change.

          so this adds a setting to allow a site access to shared 3rd party cookies, when the site supports the feature?