• athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. That review is for news articles. If you look at the URL, it very clearly includes “blog”, so this is an opinion piece, which I take with the same amount of consideration as Letters To The Editor.

    2. Richard Nixon? You can’t expect us to trust anything associated with a ratfucker.

    • ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Uh… yes. It’s an opinion piece. You can disagree with the analysis from an opinion piece, but I linked mediabias checker to show it’s not just some random blog with no credibility that would just post an “AI Russian propaganda article”

      (Also quiz for the class: who founded the EPA lmao)

      • Ooops@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can disagree with the analysis from an opinion piece

        That would require an actual analyses existing instead of just a strong opinion with no evidence.

        • ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did we read the same article? It’s not super deep analysis (what do you expect from libertarians) but he’s backing up his claims with actual reporting if you follow the hyper links.

          • NoiseColor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you read the title of this article? Brilliantly loaded with two Russian taking points : US being the reason for the war and that Ukraine cannot win and should not even fight. No one that cares about credibility would write that.