• troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    IANAL - but I’ve worked for Big Company and have gone through the patent process a few times. A patent isn’t what’s written in the supporting text and abstract. It’s only the exact thing written out in the claims.

    First claim from the patent the abstract is from:

    1. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored therein a game program causing a computer of an information processing apparatus to provide execution comprising:

      controlling a player character in a virtual space based on a first operation input;

      in association with selecting, based on a selection operation, a boarding object that the player character can board and providing a boarding instruction, causing the player character to board the boarding object and bringing the player character into a state where the player character can move, wherein the boarding object is selected among a plurality of types of objects that the player character owns;

      in association with providing a second operation input when the player character is in the air, causing the player character to board an air boarding object and bringing the player character into a state where the player character can move in the air; and

      while the player character is aboard the air boarding object, moving the player character, aboard the air boarding object, in the air based on a third operation input.

    Exactly everything described above must be done in that exact same way for there to be an infringement.

    • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      Which sounds like mount selection based on if onland==True: landmountlist, else: airmountlist. ??? Can you really patent “I used an if statement to change what the mount button does based on a condition”

      Boy, better fucking patent that fucking pure genius there’s no way anyone could program that without having copied us.

      Like I fucking hope I misread that.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That seems a bit more easy to get around. It is still crazy to think that you have to check your whole game design against that many patents 😅

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        it’s stupid. I’m convinced that people who oversee software patents don’t even know what’s a computer.