• Corigan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    They threaten/shit down the government every other issue… Like a toddler having a tantrum.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      a toddler throws a tantrum when it thinks it can get something it wants from the adult and democrats have a history of giving these toddlers what they wanted when they tantrum-ed hard enough; their current party leader literally used to brag about doing so in his 2020 campaign.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      “Walkouts allow a relatively small number of lawmakers to nullify the will of the majority, and that is to the detriment of our democracy,” Alejandro Queral, executive director of the Oregon Center for Public Policy, said in an emailed statement.

      There it is. Being a shithead should cost you.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        100%. Also fine them for one months salary every time they play this “I just won’t do my job 🤷‍♂️” game. Dont wanna work, dont get paid.

        Unfortunately they all live off corporate kickbacks more than salary but at least some of that can be returned to the coffers.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Do it, yah fucking whinny-ass man-child.

    Shut the fucking government down because you’re afraid of fucking democracy.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I get the sentiment, and am also so, so tired of this. But. It’s an election year and Biden is currently president. In other words, these freaks will absolutely shut down the government, actively harm the economy, and reduce our national security because they can then blame democrats and it will help elect Trump. Please vote, donate, and volunteer accordingly…

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        only idiots see that.

        Everyone else sees that they’re actively fucking everyone over. there’s not enough idiots to sway, if everyone gets out to vote.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        They would never. They can threaten all they want but what they are really risking is the dollar as the dominant currency. If it becomes commonplace or even somewhat likely that a shutdown can happen, the rest of the world sees that as instability. These fools don’t know what levers they are messing with and the second someone actually pulls it they will shit their pants crying because they made a booboo.

  • Icalasari@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Dems need to draw a line in the sand here and do some of the campaigning on this

    “They are so afraid that they would rather shut down government than allow votes”

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I said it last shutdown but does nobody seem to notice that whenever we have a shutdown it’s because Republicans keep shitting their pants and then screaming about the smell?

    Every govt shutdown in my lifetime has been because of Republicans. These shutdowns impact millions of people yet I never see it brought up.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      They have extremely effective propaganda (fox) that just claims the exact opposite every time it happens and slightly more than half of the country’s land (not people) believe it.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Johnson plans to pair a bill funding the government for six months with a Republican bill called the “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act” or “SAVE Act,” that would require new voters to submit “documentary proof of United States citizenship,” such as a passport or a birth certificate, in order to register to vote.

    That doesn’t seem like an outrageous ask but then access to such documents should also be safeguarded, that is if the actual reason was just to prevent voter fraud/illegally voting

    • revelrous@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      This usually places undue burden on women, poor and generally anybody not a white dude.

      Say you are a woman, okay you’ve got your certified copy of your birth certificate $10-but wait the name doesn’t match because you got married.

      Now you need a marriage certificate, thats another $10 and the trouble of contacting another municipal office.

      Oh were you married twice? Thats tracking down another 2 municipal offices, another $10 marriage cert and now a certified judgement of divorce which will cost-ooh was your children’s custody agreement a part of that? $40. Did you not remember your divorce file number from 30 years ago? It’ll be an additional $5 per name per every 2 years searched.

      I’ve seen women spend like $200 just on certified copies to get a realID driver’s license. Has a chilling effect on registering, to solve a problem of voter fraud that doesn’t really exist.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        If the intention was to actually fight current or future voter fraud then they should really have an easy way of submitting that documentary proof. I don’t know what form that would take in the US and how expensive it would get, considering you’d want some stipulation that it shouldn’t have much cost to acquiring such documents, shouldn’t be too difficult and whatnot. Assuming you’d want to do that right. Not that I think that’s their genuine intention.

        Where I live in Finland we don’t have voter registering. We do check IDs when you vote, that part just seems sensible, but there isn’t an actual ID requirement. You just need to be identified without a doubt, but the form isn’t set. In specific circumstances it could even be that the officials there know you and guarantee who you are. But if you don’t have a passport (rare not to have it here), you don’t have driver’s license or ID card, you can get a temporary ID for free from the police station just for voting. But then you need to be also somehow identified there, so sorta the same problem again, but at least you have more time there than in the voting place.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          In the US, it isn’t about identification or fraud, its about hoops. The more hoops you have to jump through, the less likely “undesirables” (POC, poors, etc) are yo get it done. Like most things here, its a relic of Jim Crow and related policies. It flies so well even today because it all seems menial to somebody well off (you see it in these comments “Its only $10 what’s the problem”)

          Here, the Department of Motor Vehicles tends to be your central point of anything ID related driver or not. My city’s used to be on the bus line, but they moved it to the county far from any public transit. So if you don’t drive, that $10 is now $10 + $20 taxi/uber there + $20 ride home and depending on what you’re doing/getting you may need to go back which is another $40. So really you’re looking at $50-100 to get whatever it is.

          In my state at one time (I do think its changed here but assume its probably the same in other states) to get a birth certificate you had to go to the state capital (4 hour drive for me one way.) If you dont drive, sucks to suck. Pay someone to take you or hope you have greyhound where you live.

          I could go on, but you get the point.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yes. Lets shut down the government over this. The furloughed workers totally won’t vote democrat in protest.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s worked every other time Republicans have shut down the government. Why wouldn’t they get their way this time?

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Please shut the government down… please, please, please… while your party controls a mere one half of one of a branch of the government, please shut the government down during an election cycle. Please, please, please do it.

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Who cares what MAGA adherents believe… you don’t try to get the hard-core, brainwashed followers, they’ve already committed themselves. However, the undecided voter will see it as the GOP floundering, unable to govern.