• Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    When most of the temperature scales were made, they didn’t even know yet that there was a zero, I mean, theoretically, they likely knew or assumed. But they had no way of practically measuring it yet, at the very least.

    I do think that as much as it would be weird for a couple of years, it would help a lot in the long run to widely adopt a temperature scale that starts at 0.

    Because honestly, the percentage of adults I come across that have no idea how temperature works or what it even is conceptually beyond just “a nice day or a bad day” or “this is the number for cooking this thing” is astonishing.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because honestly, the percentage of adults I come across that have no idea how temperature works

      Just don’t ask us to define entropy.

      • applebusch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think people kind of ruined entropy with all that disorder crap. The simple conceptual explanation is that entropy represents the energy that is unavailable to do work. The more entropy a system has the less work it’s capable of doing, which ultimately means the less can happen within that system. Entropy always increases globally, because anything you do is something that happens and anything that happens means less energy available to make other things happen. The complex esoteric interpretations might have some conceptual value in specific circumstances, but like a lot of science communication the rigorous scientific definitions don’t get communicated, so now we have nebulous concepts like order and disorder floating around that just confuse people more than anything.