• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Pedantry:

    K and °R agree on 0
    K and °C agree on the unit difference
    °F and °R agree on the unit difference
    °R and °Ra are the exact same thing (??)

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 days ago

      Also Rankine, being an absolute scale, theoretically shouldn’t be in ° anything, and it’s only some weird historical quirk that is the reason it usually is called degrees.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        I am not sure I follow that. The scale is always relative right? It’s just the zero that’s absolute. But that’s also the case with measuring angles where we do use the degree symbol.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          It’s just the zero that’s absolute

          Right, that’s what makes Rankine and Kelvin absolute scales, while Fahrenheit and Celsius are relative.

    • neoman4426@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Celsius and Fahrenheit agree on -40, but since they’re scales that scale at different rates there’s bound to be some value where they intersect rather than some meaningful number like Kelvin and Rankine being zeroed to Absolute Zero

    • fishpen0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Good thing °R and °RA aren’t pointing guns at each other

      Neither are °F and °R nor °K and °C

      This is almost artfully done

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        This screenshot is a little bit hard to see, but from what I can tell:

        °RA is pointing at °R and °C
        °C is pointing at K and °F
        K is pointing at °R and at °F
        °R is pointing at °F (and the other gun isn’t aimed at anyone in particular)
        °F is pointing at K and at °C

        Emphasis disproves your claims, sadly. Perhaps there was another way to label them to make it fit, but that’s not what was done here.

  • Revan343@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 days ago

    Rankine and Kelvin have zero at the same point, which is absolute zero, and should not be used with the degree symbol

    This concludes my TED talk

    • hakase@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      According to Wikipedia Rankine is properly used with the degree symbol, but sometimes is not by analogy with Kelvin.

  • aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Celsius tried to fit too much into 100 notches to please big math.

    F is more nuanced with more notches, but the ends aren’t logical. It coukd be shifted perhaps, but how?

    If freezing was moved to 0, then water boiling would be 180

    Perhaps C could have had a 200 degree range, then it would be closer to F and not so hard to convert.

    But also: Scientists are important and we shouldn’t make it too easy, it demeans their work. Maybe make the C scale show water boiling at 183.4521 degrees so scientific calculations are more impressive-looking and respectable.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      and not so hard to convert

      “Please change the entire world’s system to make it easier for the one country that uses a different one”

      • pyrflie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        It’s more like “please convert two nonsense systems to be more workable via math”. C is pretty unfriendly to universal math and depends on earth gravity, I’m not going to defend F on any standpoint.

        The reality is we should all be using K.

      • Malgas@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        It wouldn’t even change the difficulty, really. You’d just wind up multiplying or dividing by 9/10 instead of 9/5.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          America moving zero to Celcius’ zero would be better, it would remove one whole step from the calculation

          Then if they made their degrees about 9 fifths the size (they could get higher resolution than they’d lose by doing what we do and quoting temperature to one decimal place where needed) it would be dead simple to convert (just change the symbol from °F to °C!)

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    When having a beer, I’ve always found it funny that one of the few imperial measurements metric nations kept around, the pint, America went and invented their own. Uncharacteristically a smaller version too.

    • ryan213@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      Every time I hear, “pint” I think of Pippin saying, “they come in pints?!”

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      The US has their own version of all the imperial units. Also who uses pints except the Brits?

        • voracread@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          We don’t use pint here. We have some traditional measures that have different absolute values depending on location. We are almost totally metric here.

          • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            I could’ve sworn I once had a pint but it was in a hotel lobby in Bangalore so not quite representative. I stand corrected, thanks.

      • pingveno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        I just started looking up the different ways to order beers. Wow. Even if it’s based on the metric system, each country really did go and reinvent the wheel.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        They haven’t, but some still sell beer by pints. I can go to a store right now (well not right now, it’s past 10 PM) and buy a pint sized beer and a 0.5l beer from the same company.

    • Undearius@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      America didn’t really invent their own volume of measurements, they just didn’t keep up.

      They used what the British used, then separated from Britain, and didn’t update the units when Britain did.

    • Puttaneska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yes, I think the US pint is 16 Oz (2 cups), whereas the UK pint is 20 Oz (4 gills).

  • Trev625@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I went down a huge rabbit hole cause of this. I personally like °F over °C but agree it’s arbitrary. So I tried to make a scale that started at the coldest air temp on earth (some day in Antarctica) and went to the hottest day on earth (some day in death valley) and put the coldest day at 0°A and the hottest at 100°A.

    Sadly this made a scale that was less precise than I’d like. I like that I can feel the difference between 73°F and 74°F and don’t want to have to use decimals.

    So maybe the end points could be only places where people actually live. Well it looks like some people live in Russia around -70°C and some people live in northern Africa around 50°C so if you just take °C and add 60 you can get a -10 to 110 scale where most temps would fall between 0 and 100. Still has the unit difference of °C (which I don’t like) but I like that most temps are between 0 and 100. I also don’t really like negative temperature since it seems wonky.

    To “fix” the unit scale you could just multiply everything by 2 so the difference between each full degree is half as much. So temps would be between -20 and 220. °A = 2(°C + 60) °A = 2(°C) + 120

    And it turns out I (basically) created the Fahrenheit scale but moved. °F= 1.8(°C) + 32

    TL;DR: I’m stupid and this was fun but also a waste of time lol

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Rankine isn’t pointing a gun at Kelvin because of this, but Kelvin is pointing one at Rankine because Rankine is an abomination that should not be

  • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    This is more like if you measured altitude by counting from sea level vs the center of the earth vs the top of Mount Everest or something

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    Meanwhile, Pi and the Fine Structure Constant watching the show, passing each other the popcorn.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      The best part about the fine structure constant is that it is not related to any other thing. It just is.

      It’s a magic number that just emerges in physics.

      And it is not constant.

      Even though it is.

      • niktemadur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Dimensionless numbers, not dependent on any mere mortal, subjective arbitrary unit of measurement like length (meters or yards or cubits - same difference) or time.
        Whether you are on Earth or a planet in Andromeda or a billion light-years away, if you study subatomic structure you WILL bump into the fraction 1/137. Just like you will in geometry with 3.1416.