• VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Six cities that declared themselves sanctuary cities? Surely those are the best places, they actively advertise migrants are welcome.

    And you say dumping them but then say they’re an economic and cultural benefit, surely if you believe that you think its great thes six democrat cities benefit?

    As for the cost, maybe those cities could send their own busses to collect them instead? Would be a strong move politically plus they could be better prepared for their arrival. But yes that’s not a huge amount of money for the logistics of moving people, cheaper than housing them all and paying all the other costs in the boarder towns they come from, cities have far more resources and better infrastructure. Though of course it wouldn’t be popular for the local politician because as we’ve seen the sanctuary cities get upset when faced with the reality of large numbers of immigrants.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      they actively advertise migrants are welcome.

      They actually don’t. Denver tells them they don’t have the resources to help them and pays to have them bussed elsewhere (of their choice, instead of tricking them and lying to them like Texass does.)