like you go to the not-believing-until-seeing convention with lies and what? expect to get away with it?

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well there we go!

    In ideal world, things like that would not be necessary, but as we know, asking countries to destroy their weapons never leads to their prosperity… so fuck that, too.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I didn’t ask about Ideal world NATO, I asked about NATO which implies the context of reality we currently live in.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Did I not answer that question in my first comment? Wait - I did.

        I then tried to hint that (as my first comment actually started), we as species should try to build a better world, focusing on providing the minimum for everyone before giving very few everything there is.

        Is NATO perfect? No, it sucks, but we currently won’t do any better. Like nothing I keep repeating all over here.

        But I wish we stopped everything, and I mean everything apart from housing and basic food, to actually solve the climate crisis.

        And, ironic as it is, stopping everything would actually be the best thing right now.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Building a better world involves unconditional support of mutual defence pacts such as NATO. Once you’ve eliminated the cause for NATO, then dissolving NATO will make sense. Building a better world without NATO just sounds like some Putin/CCP Cocksucking in the context of our reality.

          • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Once you’ve eliminated the cause for NATO, then dissolving NATO will make sense.

            The cause for NATO was eliminated. NATO didn’t dissolve. It grew. Spoiler alert: there are no good guys in a war between imperialists.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes yes yes, that is exactly what I mean the entire time, thank you for understanding it. We ALL should agree to forget losers, psychopaths, and everyone who want to have power over others, and focus on problems of the weakest ones first and foremost.