like you go to the not-believing-until-seeing convention with lies and what? expect to get away with it?

  • dariusj18@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This kind of behavior would still exist without money. People would still fake stuff for the clout.

      • dariusj18@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s only because money exists. If you removed money from the equation, clout would be the new currency that everyone lies and cheats for.

          • dariusj18@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            OK, so money corrupts, money exists, everything is corrupt. What’s the point of pointing that out?

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          But being caught in a lie would destroy your clout instantly. If they’re competing for clout there would be a big incentive to prove the competition wrong.

          • dariusj18@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            There is something to that, in that money gained will be kept (unless lawsuits can claw it away for fraud), but with both scenarios the ethically lacking individual would still have enjoyed the time until they were caught and future money/clout would both be hampered.

            As for competition, that sounds the same to me. There is already competition for positions and grants, etc.