• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I miss the days when my much slower internet connection let me download entire videos faster than streaming to watch them with less buffering and fewer glitches. Now that I have a rock solid gigabit fiber connection with single digit latency, how is watching video such a bad experience?

      • RockaiE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        The frustrating thing is that when I do see ads, the ad itself plays in higher resolution, and plays more smoothly than the video I’m trying to watch.

        • sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Different CDN with better allocation of resource and location than the CDN for the content you’re watching.

          Makes sense, the ad people are the real customers vs your attention the product.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Years ago I had the free version of Hulu that came with ads (it used to have the free ad tier, and the paid-for-no-ads tier). Hulu did the dynamically scaling resolution to match your connection thing, which was mostly good for me since I didn’t have great internet and I’ll take smooth playing 720p over constant buffering. I don’t know if the ads scaled or were naturally at a reasonably low resolution, but I never had a problem with them playing through

          One day though, something changed. Suddenly ads were coming in only in the highest resolution supported by Hulu at the time. Thanks to my terribly slow internet, this meant horrible buffering. Combined with ads being louder than programs, a 30 second ad turned into a multi-minute experience of a few frames at a time screeching at me before buffering again.

          I didn’t keep Hulu long after that.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you watched in in 320p like the old days then it might be faster?

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Internet providers have more or less been given permission to throttle and be selective all they want, due to the Supreme courts recent rulings. Before that, they at least tried to hide it.

      Run your stuff through a good vpn and you might d8scover all of your problems disappear. It sure as heck does on t-mobile.

    • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m sure the practice of net neutrality helped back then. Sure net neutrality is the rule again, but that doesn’t mean everyone instantly started following the rule.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel like a lot might have to do with shitty hardware in smart TVs, but idk if you use a smart TV.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Generally not. Nowadays it’s difficult to avoid a smart tv, but that doesn’t mean you need to use that functionality …. I am now, mostly because my firestick is getting shittier plus doesn’t have an Apple TV app. However I mostly watch streaming video on tablet