I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning, both lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl’s(K?) ridiculous and biased interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against Kamala Harris on that network?
Who’s surprised he’s trying to chicken out?
If he does drop out of the debate again, I bet they could get him to recommit by going all Biff Tannen on his ass:
“What’s the matter McTrump? Chicken?”
He’ll bristle, and say he’s no chicken and agree to debate Kamala.
In all seriousness, I was surprised agreed to debate her at all, given that he has nothing to gain. Best cash scenario, he tries the same approach he used with Biden, turning his mouth into a fire hose of lies, and Biden couldn’t keep up. With Kamala, she’d just laugh at his lies, and actually refute him with facts, he’d look just awful in comparison.
At this point I doubt he’ll actually show up to the debate.
One of the issues he has is that ABC and the Dems want real time fact checking.
The nerve! Not allowing him to just stand there and lie without being challenged!
How would real-time fact checking even work? Would the moderators actually do their job for once and call it out, or would they just do little VH1/“Pop Up Video”-style graphics where they would highlight whether they would try to correct the record on certain things being said?
Either would be better than what’s happening now.
Would the moderators actually do their job for once and call it out
That’s actually not the job of moderators. This idea that moderators should do fact-checking only came about in 2016 because of Trump.
The network probably should have a team of fact-checkers. But fact checking in real time isn’t easy.
I would like to have the moderators do anything at all, though, that would be nice. Like cut off a candidate who goes over time. Maybe force candidates to answer the question asked or forfeit their time.
I feel like this would be an actually valuable application of AI.
Ai uses the internet, right? Especially for current stuff. Could people flood the airways with the information that they prefer and sway the bot?
The problem with that is that AI itself is unreliable and will be confidently incorrect all the time.
Here’s my proposal.
During each candidate’s first turn to speak, no fact checks are shown, but the fact checkers will use the other candidate’s turn to come up with corrections. Then when it’s the first candidate’s turn again, the start of that their speaking time is used to read the corrections from their previous statement. If the corrections take the whole speaking slot, too bad so sad.
If corrections also rollover into the next speaking window, Donald could just do his first slot and then go golfing.
Hopefully both, and there’s a Lie-O-Meter that determines how truthful a statement is as its being read, and then a counter of provably false statements made
Not like a here is a one in a billion outlier so the truth is a lie. If crime is down, but up in a small, specific area, the statement “crime is down” would be true.
It’d be nice if there was some sort of objective, quantitative “score” that could be attached to each candidate’s performance (or as objective as it can be). Something at the end of the night you could point to and be like, “Yeah, they’re a goddamn liar-mouth.” Something either candidate could point to as a “win” without resorting to just soundbites that get blasted the whole week after and people are like, “Oh snap, they said that!” Like, an actual way to tell how honest either candidate seemed during their “performance”. I’m sure Trump would lie his ass off and his base would be like, “Well of course ABC is going to say Trump lied, they’re owned by woke Disney!”, but at the very least we’d have some sort of tracking of how much they lied during a debate.
There is no objective measurement Repubs won’t ignore if it becomes an obstacle to white supremacist fascism and shoveling money into the yachts of the wealthy.
He can just bring in alternative fact checkers
“I heard McDonalds has a new menu item now, they’re calling them Chicken McTrumplets… Bawk… bawk… bawk… bawk”
I never thought he’d go through with it.
When he was clearly winning against Biden, he had nothing to gain. As he loses pace in the polling, his need to do a debate increases.
Great. Give Harris the time slot for a big town hall speech and Q&A. Every 15 minutes, read a reminder to everyone watching that Trump declined to debate.
Keep the two podiums and put a wax figure of Trump in a chicken suit behind the other one. Put the camera on it with dead air for a few seconds every time it’s his turn to speak.
The chicken suit is too on the nose. And a cardboard cutout is probably way cheaper than a wax statue.
There’s no such thing as “too” on the nose when it comes to needling Trump and his gaggle of dipshits.
I agree with the cardboard cutout part, though: half-assed shoddiness represents him more authentically and he deserves no better.
Have someone run in half way through to spray orange spray paint on the cardboard face, call it a touch up.
Use cheap, low density wax and it’ll slowly melt under the studio lights over to course of the program, which would be hilarious.
Ice sculpture so as the night progresses the sculpture gets sadder looking.
I am betting that she will be there whether he is or not. No reason to miss an opportunity like that.
Just do the debate, give his time to a ticker that just says “trump was too scared to be here, I concede the rest of my time.” For every question.
Seems fair.
Christopher Hitchens once debated himself on religion when his debate opponent didn’t show up. It was pretty brilliant.
I’m trying to find the YouTube video, but I can’t find it.
deleted by creator
Have a ticker constantly running at the bottom that #1 he backed out, #2 she only agreed to consider to debate on Fox “News” after the ABC debate which he already agreed to.
IIRC she didn’t agree to fox news. They said something like any other debates would only be considered after the scheduled one.
Updated to reflect that…tnx
I didn’t expect this meme to come up again so soon. /s
It’s been such a long time I need to watch it again, but did they ever get their sausages?
5 minutes Turkish!
“It was 2 minutes 5 minutes ago.”
Yep. Donald is too weak and cowardly.
It’s the bone spurs
Donald Trump is a coward. But we all knew that already.
But he wants to debate on Fox. The station that was held legally liable for lying for him. The station that has to admit to being “entertainment” not news. Yeah, that’s a better choice.
Trump considers dropping out of having his dumb ass handed to him.
Make him afraid some more
St. Alia of the Knife
Fear is the mind killer, as they say. And trump doesn’t have much mind so it shouldn’t take much fear.
“What we really need is an honest debate with principled moderators on a network built on trust and seeking veracity of all claims: Fox News! Only the most Trustworthy™ will do, Sean Hannity and Laura Inbread… wait… Ingrate… No… Ingram! Right right Ingram.”
No where near enough random capitalization to make that believable.
Very true. I honestly don’t think it’s random though, I believe he’s branding terms. It’s always a name or a concept: Crooked Joe Biden, Democrat Witch Hunt, Kamala Crash, etc… when I do it I just add the “™” to make it more obvious.
I mean full words that are CAPITALIZED.
What an absolute coward. Isn’t it the conservative maga “tough guy” crowd who calls everybody pussies? Is trump not being a total pussy?
Orange Chicken
lol what a bitch
Why did Donald Trump cross the road?
He was running away from a debate with Harris.
Bok Bok Bok
