• BertramDitore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Haven’t we always known this? It’s the same concept as a Stingray device, which is used to spy on people because their devices connect to it automatically, assuming it’s a normal cell tower. People don’t know what tower they’re connected to, so if you connect to a “fake” or exploited tower, you’ve basically handed over the keys. This is essentially the same thing, but on a 5g network, which is presumably made up of even more nodes/towers.

    • JustinA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Stingrays generally use 2G, as the security on earlier standards was pretty lax/broken. I thought that tower spoofing wasn’t possible on 4G/5G?

      • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 months ago

        Always assume that even if not publicly available, some agency has knowledge of how to spy on you.

      • BZ 🇨🇦@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        4G had a lot of the same issues as 3G, but 5G was a complete redesign (including security). It was supposed to have been way harder to break than previous generations.

  • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d like to dig up some technical information on this. It has a lot of claims of what hackers can do but how do they do it at a technical level? Is using VPN helpful? Stuff like that.

  • polumrak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ive installed so much crap voluntarily, I don’t think I have any private data left. Why would they even bother?

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    what is the benefit to end user from 5G?

    And all these features for the threat actors lol

    • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Higher peak data rate, lower latency, more network capacity are basically the main improvements for phone users. Partially because the whole radio protocol (among other things) was redesigned to reduce overhead and also because of the new mmWave bands which have enormous bandwidth.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I can’t tell the difference in everyday usage. Speeds are surely as fuck ain’t any better.

        • Zeoic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Was a massive improvement here. Went from 50mbps down with a decently long delay when loading new pages to 800Mbps with basically instant page loading.

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I never seen anything nearing 800mbps for cell phones outsid of corpo propaganda but maybe your area is not as congests as tests in major cities

            • Zeoic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I am not in the downtown core, but and pretty well right in the middle of a 1 million population city. I do believe the 5G tower is on the building right beside mine though, so I may just be lucky.