I’m sorry, but are we reading the same article? There’s no mention of anybody sending porn to anyone let alone about reading books to kids in a costume. You alright man?
My bad, my comment required not just reading this article, but having a basic understanding of current events, and that was clearly way too much to expect from you.
There’s no mention of anybody sending porn to anyone
“It sends a report to your accountability partner. My accountability partner right now is Jack, my son. He’s 17. So he and I get a report about all the things that are on our phones, all of our devices, once a week. If anything objectionable comes up, your accountability partner gets an immediate notice.”
So if he looks at anything “objectionable” (meaning porn), it sends it so his underage son.
let alone about reading books to kids in a costume
That part was about the conservative outrage about people in drag reading to kids. I was pointing out how drag is apparently too sexual for kids, but their fathers porn watching habits is not not.
I’m sorry my knowledge of internal politics of a country I don’t live in did not match your expectations. Controversy about people reading books to kids in drag indeed sounds really important though and definitely something I should have been aware of. This is totally a failure on my part.
So if he looks at anything “objectionable” (meaning porn), it sends it so his underage son.
Previously you said:
So he’s sharing what kind of porn he looks at with a minor.
Is he sending his son links to porn or is he not? You’re not being very cohesive here.
I’m sorry my knowledge of internal politics of a country I don’t live in did not match your expectations.
No problem. I just assumed that since you’re engaging in a debate about it, you know at least the basics about the current political situation.
Is he sending his son links to porn or is he not? You’re not being very cohesive here.
By looking at porn, the programs he installed on his and his sons devices shares it. It’s cohesive, you just need to thing about for more than 1 second.
Reading books to kids in a costume is way too sexual, but automatically sending porn to your underage kid is not, got it.
That’s the jizz of it.
I’m sorry, but are we reading the same article? There’s no mention of anybody sending porn to anyone let alone about reading books to kids in a costume. You alright man?
My bad, my comment required not just reading this article, but having a basic understanding of current events, and that was clearly way too much to expect from you.
“It sends a report to your accountability partner. My accountability partner right now is Jack, my son. He’s 17. So he and I get a report about all the things that are on our phones, all of our devices, once a week. If anything objectionable comes up, your accountability partner gets an immediate notice.”
So if he looks at anything “objectionable” (meaning porn), it sends it so his underage son.
That part was about the conservative outrage about people in drag reading to kids. I was pointing out how drag is apparently too sexual for kids, but their fathers porn watching habits is not not.
Clearly it says a report is sent, not the actual content. I’m all with you but let’s not invent stuff
deleted by creator
yes
I’m sorry my knowledge of internal politics of a country I don’t live in did not match your expectations. Controversy about people reading books to kids in drag indeed sounds really important though and definitely something I should have been aware of. This is totally a failure on my part.
Previously you said:
Is he sending his son links to porn or is he not? You’re not being very cohesive here.
No problem. I just assumed that since you’re engaging in a debate about it, you know at least the basics about the current political situation.
By looking at porn, the programs he installed on his and his sons devices shares it. It’s cohesive, you just need to thing about for more than 1 second.