StarshotJohn@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoTechnologylemmy.worldimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down11
arrow-up16arrow-down1imageTechnologylemmy.worldStarshotJohn@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoBrother printers can lick my salty nuts for exactly this reason.
minus-squarePons_Aelius@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt is not brothers fault. It was something they were forced to do. More generally, I have found Brother to be the least worst printer company. If you are only printing text, a low end brother laser printer is by far your best option. If you are printing less than a couple of hundred colour pages a year you are better off going to a print shop to do so as it will be cheaper. If you are printing more than a couple of hundred colour pages a years look into Epson ecotank printers as they are the most cost effective option.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoThe printer wouldn’t even scan without ink though. I’m also not in the USA.
Brother printers can lick my salty nuts for exactly this reason.
It is not brothers fault. It was something they were forced to do.
More generally, I have found Brother to be the least worst printer company.
If you are only printing text, a low end brother laser printer is by far your best option.
If you are printing less than a couple of hundred colour pages a year you are better off going to a print shop to do so as it will be cheaper.
If you are printing more than a couple of hundred colour pages a years look into Epson ecotank printers as they are the most cost effective option.
The printer wouldn’t even scan without ink though.
I’m also not in the USA.