• Yote.zip@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is the etiquette for posting YT links in this scenario? If the content is from YT I’d prefer to post the canonical link instead of a mirror that may go down or may get hugged to death. If you’d rather view on a mirror I’d suggest you use e.g. LibRedirect. Does this make sense? Are there better ideas? I’d like to promote non-YT frontends but am not sure what the best option here would be.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Piped is not a mirror, it’s just like a backdoor access to the original YouTube video.

      So if you can access it on YT, you can access it on Piped

      • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So if you can access it on YT, you can access it on Piped

        Unless Piped dies

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Piped can’t die. It’s just software. Maybe one instance can “die” and go offline for some reason but there are thousands more.

          Same for Invidious.

            • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The bot OP is talking about links to a single website. But the code running the site is used to run many sites like it. Similar to how Lemmy works.

              That’s my understanding, anyway. I haven’t looked too much into it, so I could be wrong.

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t imagine there’d be any damage to posting two or more links: the YT one, a piped one, an invidious one, etc… All sides of the conversation that matter are covered.

  • Moskus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would be stupid, but very funny if someone created a YouTube bot for Piped links…

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot take: Piped API sucks and is a giant waste of resources (unless you’re running your own instance)

        • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          What does that have to do with the API though? You said that the API sucks I’m curious about that part. I understand thinking the public instances suck because they can never keep up and get overloaded but your original comment said that the API itself was bad somehow.

    • Dog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. I’ve had to switch instances so many times, it’s frustrating.