• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Not guilty” doesn’t necessarily mean “innocent”. Often it just means “not confessing”, ie the prosecution has to go through the motions to prove he’s guilty.

          • broface@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No it’s not.

            It’s functionally identical to what you thought ‘not guilty’ was.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If you plead “no contest”, the prosecution does not have to prove your guilt and the court will proceed to sentencing just as if you had pleaded “guilty”. Functionally, it is identical to a guilty plea.

              no contest: A plea by a criminal defendant that they will not contest a charge. A no contest plea does not expressly admit guilt, but nonetheless waives the right to a trial and authorizes the court to treat the criminal defendant as if they were guilty for purposes of sentencing.

              • broface@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Per your article:

                A plea by a criminal defendant that they will not contest a charge.

                Your original comment:

                “Not guilty” doesn’t necessarily mean “innocent”. Often it just means “not confessing”

                “Not guilty” means you are contesting the charges. No contest means you’re not confessing and not contesting the charges.

                the prosecution has to go through the motions to prove he’s guilty.

                This is only true if the defendant contests the charges. “Not confessing” and “contesting” are two different things.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “Not confessing” and “not contesting” are different things. So, as I originally said, someone who doesn’t want to confess can still plead not guilty. Which, as I said, has a completely different function than pleading no contest.

                  • broface@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    someone who doesn’t want to confess can still plead not guilty.

                    Then they would be contesting the charges. A plea of ‘not guilty’ means you are contesting the charges.

                    has a completely different function than pleading no contest.

                    Yes, contesting the charges has a completely different function than not contesting the charges.

                    You seem to equate a plea of ‘not guilty’ with ‘not confessing.’ This isn’t true. A plea of not guilty means you are contesting the charges.

                    A plea of ‘no contest’ means you are not contesting the charges, nor are you admitting guilt (confessing.)

                    Sorry, I’ve explained things as best I can. If you don’t get it now, you never will and I think we should both move on.

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      LIke this:

      Prosecutor: “The defendant is charged with murder.”
      Judge: “How do you plead?”
      Defendant: “Not guilty, your honor.”
      Judge: “Okay, the trial will begin on…”

      In the US justice system the defendant is presumed innocent until they either plead guilty or the prosecution proves that they are guilty. That’s just how it works.

    • broface@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pleading is essentially asking the defendant, “did you do it?”

      Edit for those who want to skip the comment chain:

      “Did you do it?”

      Yes == Guilty

      No == Not Guilty

      Neither == No contest

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not exactly. It’s more like asking the defendant, “Do we have to prove you are guilty, or are you going to save us the effort?”

        You are free to answer “Not guilty” even if you did it. It doesn’t mean “I’m innocent”, it means “I’m not admitting guilt”. In other words, “Prove it”.

        • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Close, it means - “I’m not admitting guilt under these specific circumstances.” They could be working out a plea deal with the prosecution for a specific sentence, or a dozen other things up to, and including the “prove it” gamble.