• Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Idk if original stories is something you can give it. The bigger death star is far from the only plot point lifted directly out of episode 4. Seriously, go back and watch ep 4 and ep 7 it’s almost shot-for-shot (not really but for some of the story beats it could be).

    Maybe what you’re saying is that the character back stories are original which, kinda.

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah. It didn’t seem like a complete waste watching 7. It felt completely redundant, but I enjoyed the Daniel Craig and Yayan Ruhian cameos, which pushed it into a mildly positive territory for me.

      What I don’t get is why would anyone watch 8, let alone 9 after that. Sounds like some variety of Stockholm Syndrome is at play here. I didn’t, and from what I heard it was a smart decision.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve heard that said, but I think a lot of the accusations of unoriginality between 4 and 7 are mostly because they have similar themes by virtue of belonging to the same series.

      “Ugh, John wick found another reluctant health professional to patch trim up after getting shot”.

      kind of thing.

      I think Star wars is pushing really hard to reboot Star wars entirely. 2, so they don’t want to do anything new so much as update some of the old stuff with their own characters so that the new movies take over the old ones like the new Canon is taking over the old Canon.

      • Donkter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Idk how you could reach that conclusion. Maybe you watched 7 and haven’t seen 4 in a while. It’s not just your John Wick example. The movie is pretty shameless about lifting the structure of 4, it’s not some subtle nuanced technicality.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Watched four through six before checking out 7.

          Do you have some examples that you’re talking about specifically besides mega death Star?

          It seemed pretty clear to me that Disney was trying to remimagine elements of four so that they could have a new series all to themselves, but the movie itself felt new in a lot of ways.

          Finn was a huge part of that, there was never a character like him before.

          They also didn’t have a Kenobi leading them through everything.

          It’s the Star wars universe so a lot of the themes and elements (spaceships, and overbearing government, manichean forces) are going to be similar, but you had new characters doing different things for different reasons in different situations for most of the movie.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Star Wars is like going to McDonalds and ordering a Big Mac. A lot of people will get that Big Mac and feel nostalgia for when they’re young and thought McDonald’s was the best restaurant. Even though we all McDonalds is really far from being the best restaurant (we all know that), when you bite into that burger and the nostalgia makes it taste better than it really is.

        But it seems foolish to go to McDonalds, order a Big Mac, then getting a Big Mac, then complain about it not being something new and original.

        Maybe some people have just grown out of Star Wars, and that’s fine. But it seems a lot of people pretend that they aren’t action adventure movies designed to sell toys just so they can be disappointed when that’s what they get.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I do feel sympathy for George Lucas repeatedly telling people since 1977 that these are movies for children, then he sells it to the ultimate children’s company and then people going to see the Disney movies are shocked that it’s a fun, light space adventure.

          But I knew what I was getting into and I had a very fun time with seven, whereas nine is bad to the point of being insulting to any audience, including a child audience.

          I am curious to see if the critical success of Andor, a more gritty Star wars tale, rubs off on the new movies.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nine has many layers to it. It’s the most interesting of all of the Star Wars movies, just isn’t appreciated by hot take internet culture that fixates on the nitpicks.

            In one of the layers, it has a good message for children that are learning in school that their ancestors did terrible things. You don’t have to identify with your ancestors, you can and should identify with the good people in the past. Even those that opposed your ancestors.

            Probably don’t need to go so far as changing your name because your ancestors did some bad shit, but it’s Star Wars, people are always changing their names to signal their alignment.