• EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    5 months ago

    or itcould take several hours

    only if you have a shitty computer full of garbage. My windows updates only take 2 minutes or less. even feature updates only take about 4 minutes to reboot.

    Windows is only shitty if you don’t know how to use it. Just because you know what the buttons do doesn’t mean you know how to use it.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You have to cut Microsoft some slack on mandatory updates. They’re still traumatized from the XP era when they were the platform of choice for botnets and “Windows security” was a laughing stock.

          • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Tbh, if Linux had the same user base as windows had back then a large amount of people would postpone any update indefinitely and we’d be in the same shit.

            • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah it’s a different game when your user base is tech savvy and self-selecting. When you have to deal with a billion non-technical people you have to be a lot more protective.

              But even so Linux seems miles ahead. It’s Microsoft who should be the most motivated to add things like AppArmor, Flatpak, immutable system, curated app repos, executable as a filesystem attribute etc. They’re doing none of that, they plateaued at UAC and bundling their own antivirus.

        • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Absolutely, but unless you’re on a rolling release, it still won’t be that long. For example, my homelab ubuntu server didn’t get updated for over a month, but when I finally did run updates it finished after no more than a minute. Depends a bit on hardware and network speed though.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            It shouldn’t be an issue even on a rolling release. I mean it’s not like it installs every intermediary version of every package, it just jumps to the latest versions no? At least that’s how I imagine it works.

              • Mio@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yes. The question comes down to how many of these you need. And do you have the resources for it?

                • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  My Computers are all reasonably modern and decetly spec’d, resources should not be an issue. Ubuntu also ships with a lot more pre-installed packages than tumbleweed does, but I get your point.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      or it could take several hours

      Would give you enough time to get your mouse drivers working on Linux then