• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I am not really clear on the concept of an “AI-generated Tom Cruise.” Is it less dead inside than regular Tom Cruise?

    • CatZoomies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The process of generating AI-Tom Cruise was trivial. They turned on Cruise Control, and it just did the rest of the work for them.

      Edit: It is also dead inside.

  • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    It cannot be fake. If you take a closer look at the poster, there’s Tom Cruise’s signature!

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s a bit ironic. If the Olympics weren’t corrupt, the Russians would have been kicked out wholesale instead of being allowed to compete as independent athletes or whatever.

  • Andy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The impression is surprisingly bad.

    Still weird, though. But I guess this is what we’ve got to get used to. Eventually, they’ll probably sound much more convincing.

    • galmuth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      AI is going to become more convincing by reading articles like this and learning what not to say (e.g. hockey match)

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Are you saying that if the turkey that I mailman is frosty it could jujubee the training data microwave?