xkcd #2940: Modes of Transportation

https://xkcd.com/2940

Explain xkcd #2940

Title Text:

My bold criticism might anger the hot air balloon people, which would be a real concern if any of them lived along a very narrow line directly upwind of me.

alt-text:

A chart that categorizes various modes of transportation based on their practicality and danger level:

Zone of Practicality:

  • Trains
  • Airliners
  • Boats
  • Walking
  • Cars
  • Scooters
  • Bicycles

Zone of Specialty and Recreational Vehicles:

  • Motorcycles
  • Helicopters
  • Light aircraft
  • Go karts
  • Skateboards
  • Rollerblades
  • Skis
  • Unicycles
  • Sleds
  • Bumper cars

???:

  • Hot air balloons

“Hot air balloons are the optimal mode of transportation, if your optimization algorithm has a sign error.”

  • Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I cant believe bicycles and scooters are perceived as more dangerous than cars. They’re slower, offer better visibility, and kill way less people.

        • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not only. I live in Norway, where pedestrians have right of way and drivers are extremely careful. Discounting the risk from cars, there’s still more personal danger to users of scooters as opposed to cars. If you have an accident on a scooter, you’ll get scrapes, bruises, broken bones. As compared to a car, where unless you’ve really screwed up, you’re unlikely to take any injuries at all.

          Source: scooter user who HAS broken bones

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The chart needs a third dimension: danger to you, danger to others, and convenience for travel.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think most normal people can understand the difference intuitively without needing it spelled out.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Driving a car makes it more likely for your species to go extinct. Infinitely more dangerous than a bicycle.

          • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Microplastics from heavy vehicles scrubbing away their tires is a bigger issue than tailpipe emissions, which is why tailpipe emissions are the only thing focused on with regards to regulatory standards. Can’t have people thinking BEVs are similar/worse for the environment than a small car.

      • brettvitaz@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I just saw a pedestrian get hit by a person on a bike and end up with a concussion. Bicyclists don’t give a fuck about others

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are more dangerous exactly because of the existence of cars. Cars are a small fortress that makes others less safe while keeping its contents safer. Unless they hit another fortress.

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That only makes sense if you cycle among cars, but that makes cars dangerous, not bikes. If you remove cars out of equation by cycling on pavement or cycle route, the danger is gone.

        Pedestrians get hit by cars all the time yet walking is rated the safest.

    • ealoe@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hit a pothole going 25mph in your car. Hit the same pothole going 25mph on your scooter. I’ll come visit you in the hospital after the scooter one and we can talk about how cars are obviously safer.

      I ride an electric scooter, all it takes is one crack in the road that I’m less than prepared for and I’m going down hard.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think most people in the USA refer to the third item as a moped, which only gives you two categories for scooter. Scooter and electric scooter, and then moped and electric moped.

        • ealoe@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That is a good point, mine is the second variety, electric one similar to the ones you see littering any major Urban area waiting to be rented. Although even the largest scooter is still far less safe over a pothole or around a rainy curve than a car, typical accident in the car you mess up the car and get a bruise from the airbag, but a typical scooter accident can be a lot more gnarly.

  • Dayroom7485@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The placement of „Skis“ in this will trigger every Scandinavian I know. Should definitely be in the top left.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m from the Scandinavian country WITHOUT mountains and with less snow and am as such not triggered.

      You don’t know me, though, so I guess your statement might still hold true 😁

    • khapyman@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even us close to Scandinavia get triggered. There aren’t that many practical ways to get around at winter. Skis work when feet don’t.

  • notaviking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Are hot air balloon not like super safe, last accident I think was a guy that made his own DIY hot air balloon but before that it has been relatively safe. I think America has only seen like less than 800 deaths total.

    If the comic put in zeppelins…

  • Turun@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is wildly dependent on infrastructure. Both for the convenience and danger axis.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      motorcycles should 100% be in the zone of practicality, especially with modern sleek electric ones.

      skateboards should be the bridge between practical and recreational, provided you have sensible infrastructure and short distances they have distinct benefits.

      skis and sleds just need snow to make sense

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            it annoys me to no end how motorcycles and mopeds are viewed as dangerous, when every single time you hear about people being hurt on them it’s because they’re fucking idiots who tried to do a backflip infront of a semitruck

            • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Horses are technically more dangerous to ride than motorcycles. It’s just that motorcycles attract a kind of people who like doing backflips in front of a semi truck.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m here to say that if there’s snow, skis win on practicality. Almost every winter, there’s at least one day when you will have some people skiing to work in Oslo, a city of 700 000 inhabitants, with a metro system. Because when there’s 10 cm of snow in the streets, skis are the quickest and easiest way to get anywhere.

  • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Bicycles more dangerous than cars? I guess I must have missed all the stories about people being run over by bikes.

      • slipperydippery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Unless you have pepper infrastructure.

        Edit: sorry that’s not true, see this from the Netherlands:

        Voor het vierde jaar op rij kwamen meer fietsers (270; 39%) dan inzittenden van personenauto’s (194; 28%) om in het verkeer. De meeste doden in het verkeer vallen onder ouderen: in 2023 waren 375 (55%) verkeersdoden 60 jaar of ouder. Kinderen (0-14 jaar) komen juist relatief weinig om in het verkeer; in 2023 waren dat er 20 (3%). Het risico om te overlijden in het verkeer, het aantal verkeersdoden per afgelegde kilometer, is het ho ogst voor gemotoriseerde tweewielers. Het risico voor brom- en snorfietsers en motorrijders is ongeveer dertig keer zo hoog als het risico voor inzittenden van een personenauto. Voor fietsers en voetgangers is het overlijdensrisico respectievelijk acht en zes keer zo hoog als voor auto-inzittenden, in de periode 2012-2021.

        Translation:

        For the fourth year in a row, more cyclists (270; 39%) than passenger car occupants (194; 28%) were killed in traffic. Most traffic fatalities occur among the elderly: in 2023, 375 (55%) traffic fatalities were 60 years or older. Children (0-14 years) are relatively rarely killed in traffic; in 2023 there were 20 (3%).  The risk of dying in traffic, the number of traffic fatalities per kilometer travelled, is highest for motorized two-wheelers. The risk for moped and light-moped riders and motorcyclists is approximately thirty times higher than the risk for passenger car occupants. For cyclists and pedestrians, the risk of death is eight and six times higher, respectively, than for car occupants, in the period 2012-2021.

        https://swov.nl/nl/factsheet/verkeersdoden-nederland

      • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve never seen some ride a unicyle on a road in regular traffic, which is where most of the danger of riding a bike is.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d guess it’s because unicycles are used in a much narrower range of circumstances. Few people are being hit by cars commuting to work on a unicycle, nor are there many mountain-unicyclists getting injured.

      • Sidyctism@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Which honestly just speaks for the insane amount of training mountain-unicyclists have done

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          You joke (I think?), but the people I know that do unicycling (including mountain-bike style unicycling, and unicycling Himalayan trails, and crazy stuff like that) do do an insane amount of training 😆

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There are basically no unsafe ways to get off of a unicycle. You can fall in any direction and just end up standing next to your unicycle. Compare that to a bicycle “over the handle bars”-accident.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Technicalities:

    Planes are safer per mile but not per trip. One could argue that if people spent the same amount of time in both then it would be far more fatalities on aircrafts.

    Cars are technically the major source of danger for bikes and scooters.

    • sus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      also a fun fact, while commercial aviation is very safe, private planes are much more dangerous, being almost as dangerous per mile as a regular car (and you get a lot more miles per hour of travel)

      • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        That already fits with the chart - “commercial aviation” is “airlines” and “private planes” are “light aircraft”.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        private planes are much more dangerous, being almost as dangerous per mile as a regular car

        that is because they are operated by semi-competent people who often have less practice then they have in car.

        imagine how competent driver you are when you have your fresh license. it is the same with piloting license. and now imagine you are a hobby pilot and can afford to spend in the cockpit 3 hours per month. your skill is not really going to get significantly better. you are probably flying airplane that is at the end of its life, because that is only one you can afford, and there may be no one keeping an eye on you telling you “this is not how we do it, it is risky, dangerous, and you will get someone killed”.

  • Venat0r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Airliners should be below boats for convenience 😂 just because of airport security and bag collection…

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Airplane least convenient for travel from bedroom to kitchen

      Walking least convenient for travel to Antarctica

      • Venat0r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Iduno, travelling to Antarctica might be more difficult with skis than walking 😂

    • Venat0r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh, and because you have to get to the airport first with some other means of travel and then get to the terminal…

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Someone else put it this way.

    Sometimes I walk to work; sometimes I drive my car; other times i ride a bicycle. Whichever option I pick, I hate anyone who isn’t doing the same thing.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        A therapist once told me that who you are when you drive is who you really are.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            That may be the most American thing anyone has ever said!

            Also, the same therapist told me that she has a number of alcoholic patients who moved to New York City simply because they knew there was a good 24 hour mass transit system and they wouldn’t have to drive drunk.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    and i suppose blimps and dirigibles are further to the right and lower than the graph displays u_u