New Recipe for Efficient, Environmentally Friendly Battery Recycling / A new method enables 100% of the aluminum and 98% of the lithium from spent car batteries to be recovered and recycled.::A new, efficient method enables 100% of the aluminum and 98% of the lithium from spent car batteries to be recovered and recycled while minimizing the loss of valuable raw materials.

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I also like how posts like this presupose we want to recycle instead of REDUCE usage

        • EvilBit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean I agree we need to reduce usage even more than we need to recycle, but it’s falling for the Nirvana fallacy to ignore the fact that recycling improvements still have enormous potential to help reduce the environmental impact.

          • DreamButt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The world doesn’t run on fallacies. It runs on human attention. If everyone is sharing and posting about one thing then they aren’t sharing and posting about another. There’s only so much time in a day

            • EvilBit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              But you said there was a presupposition to recycling INSTEAD of reuse. They aren’t exclusive. You can rightly say “I wish we talked more about reduction instead of recycling” but there was no presupposition.

            • ZombieTheZombieCat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              When did this all or nothing way of thinking start in American culture? Has it always been like this and I’m just now noticing it, or is it much more prevalent now because it’s a side effect of a lack of critical thinking skills

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We are trying to reduce usage as well, it’s just not as obvious.

      Like sure, if you wanna say no more cars, it’s not happening at that level, but all the chemistry improvements that increase the efficiency of the batteries is still a reduction.

      We’ve reduced our need for Cobalt, some battery chemistries don’t even use it anymore.

      I think we’re still settling in on what is the ideal range of a car for cost vs range, but we’ll reach a point where an increase in performance leads to a reduction in cells used.

      Solid state batteries will be a huge jump on that front sometime in the next decade probably.

      I’m still baffled by the quantity of non rechargeable replaceable batteries out there. I have an automatic soap dispenser, it uses rechargable AA. But you know there are people out there still buying single use ones and swapping them multiple times a year.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m close to exclusively using rechargeables, but some items simply can’t get enough voltage.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No they don’t.

      And also, if you think planet earth is going to all agree to stop having road transport and get rid of any battery devices, you’re living in a fantasy world - batteries are needed, and they should be reused and recycled.