• glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Every time this gets posted you get at least a couple of people pushing up their glasses and refuting it like they’ve never ridden a bike or stuck their hand out of a car window

    • topher@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fair point. This was the first thing I looked at when I woke up today before putting my brain in gear, and I was thinking of the example of being in a train carriage at 70mph and jumping up - because the air resistance is acting upon the train, not directly upon the passenger jumping up and down, they don’t end up having the back of the train catch up to them at 70mph…

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes but if he jumps the same direction as the vehocle is going, depending on the angle he jumps at, the surface area he presents for the air resistance would be really small.