The company argues that invoking national security concerns is not a sufficient reason for restricting free speech.
  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    0·
    6 months ago

    We should not throw out our rights, just because China doesn’t have those same rights.

    China should be the example of a bad way to monitor the internet, not the end goal.

    • kbin_space_program@kbin.run
      0·
      6 months ago

      We should also not allow any company that has lied directly to the US public and the government to continue to be a private company.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        0·
        6 months ago

        So basically all big companies, certainly all major social media platforms, have to shut down or be nationalized?

        Sounds a bit drastic but ok, I’m with you!

        • kbin_space_program@kbin.run
          01·
          6 months ago

          Sure, pre “trickle down” Canada crown corporations: Passenger Trains, now private(Via Rail) Oil: Imperial Oil, now Enbridge(and its insane russian doll network of shell companies) and Petro-Canada ISPs: BCTel+AlbertaTel: Telus, Ontario and Quebec: Bell Even just that subset would drastically change Canada for the absolute better.