It started with notebooks, but that wasn’t the master plan.

It started with notebooks, but that wasn’t the master plan.

  • tal@lemmy.todayEnglish
    0·
    3 months ago

    Before they do that, I kind of wish that they’d be a laptop company that makes laptops that have 100 Wh batteries.

    It occurs to me: might Framework’s team need to focus on a few lingering laptop issues before moving on to new territory?

    Yeah. Like, if you have only 60 employees, you should have a lot of room for growth in the laptop market. Does it make sense to start spreading out resources? I’d rather see them become successful in the laptop market than become a flash in the pan.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      I don’t understand why companies keep putting such small batteries in laptops. Especially in the 16" laptop, anything less than 90 is just not acceptable in something that actually costs real money and isn’t an ultra thin device. Cheap garbage? Fine. You get what you pay for. Starting at $1700 pre built? No.

        • tal@lemmy.todayEnglish
          0·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, but that’s not what I’m talking about. It’s really hard to find laptops today that get up to 100 Wh. And the guy you were talking to wanted at least 90 Wh.

          It ain’t the FAA making laptops have 50 Wh or less batteries.

          A current Thinkpad T14 with the largest battery option is 52 Wh.

          The few laptops that you can get in 2024 with a 100 Wh battery are generally very-high-power gaming laptops with a relatively short usable battery life off one charge.

          Tuxedo Computers out in Germany makes a non-gaming 14-inch InfinityBook with a 100 Wh battery.

          There are some very expensive “ruggedized” laptops with large batteries intended for use away from civilization, like the Panasonic Toughbook (can take two batteries and do 136 Wh total).

          It’s really uncommon today.

          • samokosik@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            2 months ago

            It’s tougher to fit a reasonably sized battery to a laptop where you can replace everything. And it’s 85 which is not so far from 90.

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      Why not just use type c headphones?

      The 3.5mm thing has always baffled me, it feels like complaining your pc doesn’t have a VGA port, except the thing you connect costs like a fiver

      • 4am@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        3 months ago

        At the time, there weren’t really many good options for replacement devices.

        Using the charging port means listening to music and charging at the same time wasn’t possible.

        Now we have split-cable dongles for power banks, and we have wireless charging when possible. It’s better but it’s not great; both have downsides, and accessories are more $.

        Do they make type C headphones with a powerbank in them? Do I want a lithium battery that large on my head?

        There aren’t many upsides for the consumer or the environment. Still seems to me like this isn’t even a lateral move. Internal components have gotten smaller and more efficient since, so that space could be reclaimed. I really don’t need my phone to be that thin, a phono jack next to the charging port would be just fine. The only real downside might be waterproofing but if you can make it work for the type C port…

      • Empricorn@feddit.nlEnglish
        0·
        3 months ago

        Just replace my perfectly good $200 headphones that work in my (old) phone, my Switch, my 3DS, my laptop, my iPod, and my work phone.

        It’s so simple!

        Seriously, even if you don’t use it, why are you so against others having the choice? The headphone *jack was the standard for decades for a reason. If my phone is low on power, I’d like to be able to charge it without disconnecting my music/podcasts…

        • DrRatso@lemmy.mlEnglish
          0·
          3 months ago

          But like, 3.5 to usbc is a 10 buck conversion. Tbh i see merit in double usb c over usbc and headphone jack, might be more doable too, the DAC prolly takes more space than an additional usbc

            • iopq@lemmy.worldEnglish
              01·
              3 months ago

              It’s not a work-around, a headphone requires a DAC and an amp. In fact, my phone has a crap DAC causing artifacts in the sound. It’s actually not to my benefit to have the jack because I’d get better sound with the external DAC which is transparent.

              So the jack works, but the DAC you get can be whatever the manufacturer considers good enough.

              DACs I can hear issues in:

              My phone, my tablet, my desktop PC

              DACs that are transparent to me:

              My laptop, my $12 external DAC