• FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was in my early 20s when the Soviet occupation collapsed here, the victims here were everyone not high up in the party.

    Sure, capitalism fucking sucks but pretending the USSR was anything other than just bourgeoisie rule is delusional. The oligarchs were just called the communist party then.

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I don’t understand why anything anti capitalism these days is automatically communism. It’s such a large swing from one side to the other. I just want my taxes to pay for healthcare, infrastructure, and education instead of wars and prisons. I want to stop getting fucked by corporations that have infinitely more money than I can ever imagine. I don’t think that makes me a communist. I’m just anti-fucking-the-people. Capitalism can fuck people. Communism can fuck people too. I support Corpo-Politico-Celibacism. Stop the fucking.

      Edit: Okay, fuck the people. You guys must have this figured out.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      shock therapy was not a socialist, but a capitalist plan after the ussr ended.

          • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yea and I was commenting on how things were in a country under the occupation of the USSR. So both temporally and geographiclly unrelated.

            • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Not really. You’re talking about what happened after the USSR. Which yes, was horrible for the quality of life of people who lived in numerous countries all over the globe, but that’s more of an indictment of capitalism than communism. The looting of the government coffers to privatize everything and create oligarchs was a result of the post-USSR shock therapy.

              • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I was literally talking about the time before the USSR collapsed also it was applied to Russia, not to the countries it occupied.

                • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Ah, I misinterpreted you. Sorry about that. But it’s hard to tell exactly what you’re talking about without more details. Afghanistan, maybe? I get if you don’t want to dox yourself, as someone privacy minded, but it’s hard to know how to respond without more context.

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You should look into south america in the 70s and 80s. The CIA’s unrestrained human experimentation in the regiom perfected this ideological soft power superweapon or “strategic ideological construct”. Trying to find exactly what these kinds of things are called.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      People are starving every damn day under Capitalism and there is no famine going on. This isn’t the dunk you think it is.

      • Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve been to Capitalist countries, I’ve been to Communist countries.

        Guess which system has their people immigrating to the other system on rafts with their children, just to try the other system. Guess which system builds walls to keep people IN, guess which system has beggars asking for milk for their children instead of money.

        Your comment isn’t the dunk you think it is when it brushes up against the harsh truth that is reality.

        • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Bruh I’ve seen families begging for food outside of grocery stores in the United States of America. Now what communist countries had beggers asking for milk?

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      you knoe there isn’t only 2 choices right? Thay can both have good and bad sides. Maybe try some mix of it fisrt

        • Gigan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think human nature is inherently greedy and selfish, and capitalism is best equipped to use this in a way that benefits society. Workers are motivated to work harder and learn new skills to find the most rewarding job they can. Businesses are motivated to create products and run as efficiently as possible. Consumers are motivated to get as much value as the can out of their money. Everyone in the equation is acting selfishly and in their own self-interest (which I believe humans are inclined to do anyway) but when applied on a societal level, everyone benefits. However I will concede that this is a balancing act that requires some level of government regulation to maintain.

          On the other hand, I think communism only works when everyone acts altruistically. Which is noble, but unrealistic.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Even if it was true that human nature was inherently greedy and selfish then it would be an argument for creating systems that discourage such behaviors. What you’re arguing is akin to saying that you should encourage a person struggling with alcoholism to drink more.

          • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not going to downvote, but I do think you’re lacking quite a bit of insight into the reasons human society exists at all. Cooperation is the reason human society exists at all, so saying we’re inheritly selfish is kinda laughable in that context.

            I would encourage you to look up information on dialectical Materialism and the necessity of capitalism as a stage in that dialectical.

            Capitalism had a purpose, and it’s past time for us to move on.

          • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Lol, lmao even. Capitalism rewards greed it doesn’t mitigate it. You’ve got it twisted.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        we tried that before though, improving things temporarily, but it will never be permanent until we extinguish the owner class.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The trick is not falling for the lie that social democracy is meeting socialism in the middle.

          Social Democracy is just liberalism with enlightened self interest. Is it better than other capitalists models?

          Sure. That doesn’t make it the end goal.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Also victims of communism: anyone aged 1-99 who happens to be the wrong family, who practices wrong think, who has family members who practice wrong think, who have an opinion, who like to be different, and I can go on for a while…

    People like you should maybe watch 'the chekist". Once you’re done and not crawled up in fetal position while crying maybe you can think for a little bit about what it is that you really want.

    Seriously, you tankie types are nauseatingly naïeve.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Rent seeking behavior is wrongthink. Being Royalty is practicing wrongthink. Communism is built on Critical Theory making criticism of society its bedrock. I dont consume propaganda, I try to stick to primary sources as close as possible and make my own.

      Seriously you Capitalist Apologists are so brainwashed by literal Cold War Propaganda its pathetic.

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The USSR had a minimum sentence of 5 years of forced labor for being gay. Being gay is also apparently wrongthink.

          • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            You say that but there are numerous people in the comments defending both the USSR and Stalin.

            • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              The USSR did good things and bad things but reactionaries like to pretend it was all bad. There are hard numbers about life expectancy increasing, better life for women, research achievements, general quality of life and happiness metrics, and more that increased. There was lots of bad parts, but same in the US.

              There were anti gay laws on the books for the US, and towns you couldn’t even walk in while black. Hell, there are still some sundown towns in places in the US. If you just point out that stuff, or if you lived in such a horrible area or had family who did spreading their stories, then it will just come off as a hell hole. The US does suck, but it’s not just Skid Row, the projects, lynch mobs, coups, wars, etc. Same for the USSR. There were good things we can save and build on, and bad things we need to avoid for future socialist projects.

              It’s not like the first attempts for democracy went well, either. But I wouldn’t diss it in the Middle Ages and say we can only do monarchies, the pinnacle of political achievements, just because " it never succeeded. It fell in Greece and the Roman Republic and every other time it’s been tried, and has never worked ever and thus is always doomed to fail."

              • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                My problem with people citing those metrics is that they are true for Russia itself while ignoring that a large reason for those improvements was colonialism done to the occupied regions. Industrialisation was another thing that improved those metrics but that was hardly unique to the USSR. Some of those regions may have had benefits but here in Estonia it was pretty much all around bad. After the occupation ended the quality of life here improved rapidly.

                As far as examples for socialism I’d say the USSR was an all around failure but people still defend it and even Stalin who basically guaranteed it’s failure as a socialist project. In the baltic region the word communism is basically poisoned because of the USSR.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You need to look at the referendum to maintain the soviet union before you say shit about imperialist Russia. Non-russian SSRs were most enthusiastic about keeping the USSR around.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Somehow I assume you don’t associate capitalism with chattel slavery and apartheid. But you do associate corrupt authoritarianism with economics when it is system that you don’t like.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        What is it with people here thinking that earning a wage is slavery? That requires either a complete lack of understanding what slavery or just some serious impressive mental gymnastics.

        I associate corrupt authoritarianism with communism because it’s an inevitable outcome. Communism only works of you remove individual freedoms and force people into it. This, by design, requires a dictatorship. Dictatorships foster corruption because you can’t have transparency.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s just regular authoritarian statism, tribalism and human herd behaviour.

      Anyone unfortunate enough to have lived through high school knows how dangerous the little human empires are.

  • Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ah yes, my grandparents, the landlords. Wait hol’ up, they were working people, not landlords. GDR fucked them regardless.

    “bUt tHAT wASn’T rEaL ComMunIsM” If neither the USSR nor China could achieve true Communism, then maybe it isn’t so much a realistic goal as a utopian ideal, a convenient justification for all kinds of crimes against humanity that occur in its pursuit.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Communism isn’t a series of sacrifices for an eventual greater good, Socialism is definitely better than what preceeded Socialism in Russia and China. The idea of True Communism can only be achieved globally, sure, and in the far future, sure, but Communism is about building towards that through gradual improvements.

      You’re implying that any progress forward is useless if it doesn’t immediately achieve a far future society, it’s devoid of logic.

      • Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        No, I just have very different ideas what progress is.

        Progress in my eyes is made when a society becomes more democratic, and when we solve conflicts without bloodshed.

        In that sense, sure, the GDR was a step in the right direction, but nazi germany didn’t exactly set the bar very high.

        The idea of socialism is nice, but you hardly have any progress if the system (be it built on free markets or planned economies) doesn’t work to improve ordinary citizens’ lives, but only to keep the powerful in power.

        Personaly, I don’t care much about free markets or planned economies. I think the best approach, as so often, is a kind of blend, a social market economy that allows independent companies in a framework that protects workers, consumers and the environment.

        Thing is, the specifics of the economic system aren’t important. What matters is that the people are the ones who decide them.

        There is nothing wrong with pursuing a utopian society, but ultimatly you have no control over what happens in the far future (neither should you, future societies need to be ruled by future people).

        The only thing you can control is the present and the near future, so what really matters aren’t the ends you strive for, but the means you employ while doing so.

  • Shadowq8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I just got permabanned for evading ban on alternative account on reddit. |

    Fuck reddit

    Fuck wallstreet.