Just got a steam deck and immediately checked out the desktop mode, and I was somewhat surprised to see KDE and pacman as opposed to GNOME and apt, I have nothing against the former though a strong preference for the latter, anyone know why Volvo went in this direction?

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It was based on debian, but moved to arch.

    I think they did it because honestly, arch is better for desktop-usage due to its rolling-release model.

    Bugs in debian stick around forever.

    • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah as an Arch user I disagree. Imo a handheld meant to be a plug and play system would hugely benefit from a stable OS with a laid back update schedule. You don’t see PlayStation pushing constant updates the second BSD packages get new versions.

      As others have said, Valve has their own immutable release system, so it doesn’t really matter. In this case, the rolling release has even less to do with it. They likely chose Arch due to the up to date packages which benefit gaming.

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think that’s a good point, since they make their own immutable images, so they can use whatever versions of software they want, and you don’t normally get to update them with the rolling release

      • pathief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah but what’s the point of using Debian when you’re going to have to manually package newer versions of a lot of software?