alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agoResponsive Design Go Brrrrsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1480arrow-down110
arrow-up1470arrow-down1imageResponsive Design Go Brrrrsh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square95fedilink
minus-squarePlexSheep@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down4·edit-22 months agoYou need to turn your head to read the line number. Besides, your lines shouldn’t be longer than 80 characters anyway
minus-squareneo@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoWell, as the picture says, with this bad boy you can use 86 characters per line.
minus-squarepalordrolap@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months ago 80 characters Two hours and no-one’s challenged this? People must be asleep. (This is not that challenge. Only pointing out that someone usually has by now.)
minus-squareherescunty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoSomething something… pep8… something… 79… darkside…
minus-squarePlatypus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoEh, depends on the language and the context. I still use 80 for C, but I’ve found 120 to be a much more reasonable number for Java.
You need to turn your head to read the line number.
Besides, your lines shouldn’t be longer than 80 characters anyway
Well, as the picture says, with this bad boy you can use 86 characters per line.
Two hours and no-one’s challenged this? People must be asleep.
(This is not that challenge. Only pointing out that someone usually has by now.)
Something something… pep8… something… 79… darkside…
Eh, depends on the language and the context. I still use 80 for C, but I’ve found 120 to be a much more reasonable number for Java.