• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    They guarantee some games see the light of day when they wouldn’t otherwise, that’s good for the consumers.

    Not having reviews on the same platform is a non issue when reviews are all over the place, available from places that don’t have a financial incentive to get you to purchase said games.

    It’s not as if there wasn’t any controversies around Steam reviews either, like deleting reviews from people who asked for a refund because a game was shit.

    https://www.zleague.gg/theportal/unmasking-the-chaos-steams-controversial-review-deletion-in-the-suicide-squad-gaming-community

    • Melt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Reviews on third party platforms that are easily manipulated, shilled? No, thanks.

        • stardust@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’ve found steamers and reviewers not useful when it comes to PC ports, since they tend to review it more like console games. Most don’t even bother to try playing with a mouse and keyboard that sometimes stuff like negative acceleration is completely missed. Or ignore stuff like Fov or if the game has good remapping. Totalbiscuit was one of the few that focused on that stuff back in the day. Even digital foundry ignores stuff like that focusing more on performance.

          Even that thread you provided is a nice example of how even when manipulation takes place anonymous people have ability to make it known. I’ll take user driven input over youtubers or streamers and especially official review outlets.

        • Melt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          You appeared so condescending I didn’t read any of what you wrote