Surely the clearest path to retaining only the best.

  • downpunxx@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Some suspect Dell’s suddenly stringent office policy is an attempt to force people to quit so that the company can avoid layoffs. In 2023, Dell laid off 13,000 people, per regulatory filings [PDF].

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Exactly how my office is doing things. All of us are tracked by our phones to ensure commutes and then by IP address pulled from Entra ID and company-wide VPN. They cross reference it with our seat booking system.

    We were 100% remote for all employees since March 2019. Managers now encourage us to go out and buy food at the restaurants nearby (some even “jokingly” ask for receipts which some people keep).

    It’s more important to hold up the economy than lower emissions and improve morale, employee happiness, and productivity.

  • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m terrified that one day, I’ll be forced back into the office. I think I’ve gotten extremely lucky so far. I know 100% I would not have made it through the past couple years if I was in the office. We have personal offices, which is a step up from cubicles, but it’s 4 white walls and no natural sunlight. In the winter I saw sunlight for maybe 10 minutes total a day if I was lucky.

    I just don’t think people are meant to be working the way our current societies do. Conditions should be improved across the board for every industry regardless if you are doing white collar or blue collar work. Our lives are too short to be wasted making other people rich.

    • Quexotic@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Biggest difference in my eyes is that with a layoff you at least get to choose who leaves but in this case you only lose the best and most qualified.

      Nice work Dell.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re keeping the people willing to make sacrifices to keep their jobs. You’re keeping the most desperate, most readily exploitable people, and getting rid of anyone who won’t tolerate your abuse.

  • EndHD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You have to wonder if these “leaders” of big companies have families or hobbies or like doing literally anything normal.

    Being addicted to working and hoarding money beyond reason is an addiction at the end of the day and it has wide reaching impact. They need to get serious help.

    • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They’re not addicted to work. Just money. In exploiting regular people - both workers and customers - by robbing their wealth. Do you think their pay is proportional to their work? How do you think they get time to socialize and scheme against plebs if they are addicted to work?

      In this particular context, they insist on return to office because WFH represents a loss of returns on the investments they made on corporate real estate.

      While their addiction to money is a disorder, it’s as bad to the general public as people with antisocial and criminal tendencies. The only difference is that these rich sociopaths have enough capital to buy their way out of being held responsible. They won’t seek help because they enjoy the harm they inflict - just like how criminals don’t consider their sadism as a mental disorder. They need to be treated the same way as any other criminal - as a threat to society. And measures should be taken to prevent them from inflicting harm on normal people. Something like locking them in a cell and throwing the key away.