Instagram is profiting from several ads that invite people to create nonconsensual nude images with AI image generation apps, once again showing that some of the most harmful applications of AI tools are not hidden on the dark corners of the internet, but are actively promoted to users by social media companies unable or unwilling to enforce their policies about who can buy ads on their platforms.

While parent company Meta’s Ad Library, which archives ads on its platforms, who paid for them, and where and when they were posted, shows that the company has taken down several of these ads previously, many ads that explicitly invited users to create nudes and some ad buyers were up until I reached out to Meta for comment. Some of these ads were for the best known nonconsensual “undress” or “nudify” services on the internet.

  • exanime@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    And yet, people are still scorned and offended as if they were.

    I think you are missing the plot here… If a naked pic of yourself, your mother, your wife, your daughter is circulating around the campus, work or just online… Are you really going to be like “lol my nipples are lighter and they don’t know” ??

    You may not get that job, promotion, entry into program, etc. The harm done by naked pics in public would just as real weather the representation is accurate or not … And that’s not even starting to talk about the violation of privacy and overall creepiness of whatever people will do with that pic of your daughter out there

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is a transitional period issue. In a couple of years you can just say AI made it even if it’s a real picture and everyone will believe you. Fake nudes are in no way a new thing anyway. I used to make dozens of these by request back in my edgy 4chan times 15 years ago.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Dead internet.

        It also means in a few years, any terrible thing someone does will just be excused as a “deep fake” if you have the resources and any terrible thing someone wants to pin on you with be cooked up in seconds. People wont just blanket believe or disbelieve any possible deep fake. They’ll cherry pick what to believe based on their preexisting world view and how confident the story telling comes across.

        As far as your old edits go, if they’re anything like the ones I saw, they were terrible and not believable at all.

        • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m still on the google prompt bandwagon of typing this query:

          stuff i am searching for before:2023… or ideally, even before COVID19, if you want more valuable, less tainted results. It’s only going to get worse from here, 2024 is the year of saturation with garbage data on the web (yes I know it was already bad before, but now AI is pumping this shit out at an industrial scale.)

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is a transitional period issue. In a couple of years you can just say AI made it even if it’s a real picture and everyone will believe you.

        Sure, but the question of whether they harm the victim is still real… if your prospective employer finds tons of pics of you with nazi flags, guns and drugs… they may just “play it safe” and pass on you… no matter how much you claim (or even the employer might think) they are fakes

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I believe their point is that an employer logically shouldn’t care if some third party fabricates an image resembling you. We still have an issue with latent puritanism, and this needs to be addressed as we face the reality of more and more convincing fakes of images, audio, and video.

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I agree… however, we live in the world we live in, where employers do discriminate as much as they can before getting in trouble with the law

        • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think the only thing we can do is to help out by calling this out. AI fakes are just advanced gossip, and people need to realize that.

    • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      On the other end, I welcome the widespread creation of these of EVERYONE, so that it becomes impossible for them to be believable. No one should be refused from a job/promotion because of the existence of a real one IMO and this will give plausible deniability.

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        People are refused for jobs/promotions on the most arbitrary basis, often against existing laws but they are impossible to enforce.

        Even if it is normalized, there is always the escalation factor… sure, nobody won’t hire Anita because of her nudes out there, everyone has them and they are probably fake right?.. but Perdita? hmmm I don’t want my law firm associated in any way with her pics of tentacle porn, that’s just too much!

        Making sure we are all in the gutter is not really a good way to deal with this issue… specially since it will, once again, impact women 100x more than it will affect men