Colorado’s Democratic-controlled House on Sunday passed a bill that would ban the sale and transfer of semiautomatic firearms, a major step for the legislation after roughly the same bill was swiftly killed by Democrats last year.

The bill, which passed on a 35-27 vote, is now on its way to the Democratic-led state Senate. If it passes there, it could bring Colorado in line with 10 other states — including California, New York and Illinois — that have prohibitions on semiautomatic guns.

But even in a state plagued by some of the nation’s worst mass shootings, such legislation faces headwinds.

Colorado’s political history is purple, shifting blue only recently. The bill’s chances of success in the state Senate are lower than they were in the House, where Democrats have a 46-19 majority and a bigger far-left flank. Gov. Jared Polis, also a Democrat, has indicated his wariness over such a ban.

  • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Tell you what. How about you pass a law to disarm people based on their hateful ideologies FIRST. Make Nazism illegal, then disarm, prosecute, and imprison the neonazis, by force of law. They are currently trying to ignite a new Civil War against America, yet you want to disarm the rest of us in the face of that.

    Fix that, then we can discuss disarming law abiding citizens.

    You gonna address the question I asked? Cops only use gun bans as an excuse to kill more black people.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Imagine trusting a neoliberal government to take the guns away from those leftists deem dangerous. You really don’t see how that might go awry?

    • bastion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I could go for a law that states something like:

      To the degree that you attempt to control or suppress another person or group, you may be controlled or suppressed accordingly.

      This is magical law, but we may as well make it mundane law, too.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Like I’m in a different category than the Nazis, who rounded up and murdered Communists and Trade Unionists during the Holocaust.

        Read a book dude. History is well-documented.

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          And yet you downvoted the suggestion of making Nazism illegal. You’ve read books, and despite that, still thought that banning Nazism was a bad idea.

    • blazera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think youd have a hard time defining and identifying nazis in legal terms.

      And i dont trust any gun owner to be a law abiding citizen, we’re all animals that can get very emotional. And we have the results of that in our horrendous homicide rate.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Really? Because Germany managed it. Nazism is illegal there. They prosecute anyone who professes Nazi ideas. I don’t care how hard it would be. You think confiscating all the guns is easier?

        I don’t care who you trust. I care that this nation is too foolish and cowardly to root out the cancer it has harbored since long before it was founded. Ban sympathy for the Confederacy. Ban Nazi ideology. Prosecute those who profess it. Ruin those who fund them. Cleanse the police departments of all the Nazi cops. We will never be free of them until the day we make their ideologies illegal.

        Until then, piss off trying to disarm the millions of people who only wish to defend their homes from exactly those people pushing for civil war.

        Gee whiz, you sure don’t want to address the fact that cops only use gun bans as an excuse to murder black people.

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          just a heads up, west germany famously integrated nazis into the government and still has them to this day.

        • blazera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I would love to do how Germany does, no one gets a gun.

          Most of their nazi ban entails antisemitism, which i dont think covers a lot of people you wouldnt want to have guns. It also entails self labeling nazis, people wearing nazi uniforms, using swastikas, etc. Again, i dont think thats gonna cover most of the people youd want it to. Its better than nothing and id support it here, but its not gonna be very effective at keeping guns away from people with various nazi beliefs.

          Gee whiz, you sure don’t want to address the fact that cops only use gun bans as an excuse to murder black people.

          What gun bans?

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Every gun ban we’ve ever passed.

            If you want to ban guns, disarm the Nazis first. That’s all I ask.

            • blazera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              We dont have any gun bans. The countries that do, like Germany, have a lot less cops killing people, including black people. Im saying a sweeping gun ban takes guns away from more people with nazi ideologies than a ban on just self identifying nazis.

    • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      There a better way: if you don’t have a valid reason* to have a gun, you can’t have it. If you have a valid reason* but not to carry it, you can’t carry it and you can only use it in a target range.

      • Hunting, basically.