Yes, and that would not be currency. It might be useful to think of this as a tiered system.

‘Trade’ is a top-level idea, an exchange between entities. On a tier below that, i.e. a closer specification of ‘trade’, exists ‘barter’ (trading goods for other goods or services) and ‘money’ (trading some representational, notional item for goods/services). ‘Chickens’ as a payment is a further specification of bartering, while ‘currency’ is a further specification of ‘money’ (being ‘money’ defined/in use by a specific power/state).

Yeah. Textures and remodels.

100 GBs is mid-tier modding nowadays. That’s where you stop if you want Skyrim to still be Skyrim instead of a game made in the last 5 years that is actually good.

Really should be comparing the volume of pickup bed, not just the % of its total length

See, I pictured out he blew out his poop chute

“If you don’t stop committing a humanitarian crisis, we’re going to stop sending humanitarian aid!”

…

What?

Yea, that’s him. Seems like a top lad

I mean, I assume the actual angle is “yes, this accurate from what I’ve seen (on the other side of the law)”. I assume.

I’ve also never watched one. The only type of these I watch is the British guy from their Royal Armoury who comments on video game guns. On Gamespot(?)'s Youtube, I think

OP is why we can’t have nice things. Because people will ignore things that should be obvious. So we’re left with everything softball pitched to the lowest common denominator

Because most protests are about making the lives of normal people miserable until they’re pissed enough to hold someone to task.

Are the Tories gonna care that Stonehenge was dusted, from in their mansions? Most of them would love to dig up the stones and use them as new countertops, simply as a bragging point at their parties. But normal people that care about landmarks like these will be pissed and, maybe, bitch to the government.

Many people have given you answers of varying lengfhs, so I feel free to ask my counter-question…

You say you had int() and float() but would do you assume would happen if you had just replaced ‘input(Who are you?)’ with ‘int(7)’? What value would be assigned to name if the statement was ‘nam = int(7)’?

Following the logic you’re espousing in the OP, ‘nam’ would be equal to the string “int(7)” and the print statement would output “Welcome int(7)”. Either you understand why that wouldn’t be the case and should see why your original example works. Or you don’t and you should double check your understanding of functions and keep tapping people here for help.

What do you mean “same combat”, like Amalur made some novel innovation? They’re both just 3D, third-person action combat; it’s a mechanic. This is like knocking Fallout New Vegas because it still had you shooting guns, and we already shot guns in Fallout 3.

The game looks disappointing for plenty of legitimate reasons, so let’s stick to those.

I’m curious how the sentence “There is every reason for people to believe that” gets translated to “sure, you can think that if you want [to be wrong].”

It reads more like, “I can’t say whether it’s ‘1 plus 3’ or ‘2 plus 2’ but everybody is getting 4.” The evidence is all there.

I figured it was an attempt to get votes in before he’s declared ineligible. So when he’s ousted, he’ll say “I got all these votes, count em! I should win but they’re cheating and saying I can’t run! FRAUD!”

That’s certainly one way to blow someone’s back out

But…that’s not specifically about video games?

E3 cultivated an “insider” appeal that not many large cons tried to match. You could look forward to game reveals that you’d mark on your calendars.

PAX has a more indie feel and Gamescom feels much more like an actual trade show.

Yeah, “urban” is an American dog whistle for “black and/or Hispanic”, e.g. “the young man who rang our doorbell was so urban. i don’t feel very safe.”

As a straight man, the wording in the meme is very literal. I’m not a fan but I’ll allow it.

Is this a real stance you’re taking or are you just trolling? Explain yourself.

We’re all on the internet, you can look up the actual definition for “strawman” like I just did.

To paraphrase: strawmanning an argument is not so concretely about “putting words in anyone’s mouth”.

It is the process of debating a newly-created stance/position/idea that is easily disproven and visibly flawed when this new position may or may not be related to anything in the pre-existing debate. You don’t have to be ‘responding to anyone’; in fact, it fits more if you are not arguing something that anyone in the debate has referenced before.

Because American politics has become so barren of thought and nuance that even interacting with content containing specific images will be highlighted as support for that thing. So you can’t use memes with people you disagree with unless the meme is showing how you want to disrespect them.

And American politics continues to poison the internet “well” like the dead body it is because America has a lot of guns is looking more and more unstable by the day.