Ooh, that’s something I didn’t grok when I first saw these articles pop up. Everything is focused on the “no sex punishment” angle. But, for women, now sex is more of a Russian roulette with varying amounts of bullets based on luck and how much the man cares about contraception.
An accident could saddle them with an unwanted child. Or death outside a hospital because doctors are immobilized by “abortion bans”.
And then immediately die. Gotta brainwash them early that phone bad.
Good point! Have they checked these laboratory mice to make sure their genes haven’t been spliced?
That’s…sad in a different way.
Pretty sure they were used in self-defense in a more dangerous era. Might be an urban legend though, I never verified.
Those donuts have divots.
Where is the jam secreted?
Yeah, more confirmation that being a shithead isn’t cultural. It’s an individuals problem that is unfortunately ubiquitous.
I thought he was always on Fox. Which is merely a very stupid, malicious child pretending to be a news channel.
I don’t get what this statement is getting at in relation to the above post?
Ah, kph/“kills per hour”. My favorite American unit of speed.
Made significantly more difficult because the American president is the one doing the asking.
I’ll give him a select list of hearts I want him to dance-fight his way through.
Subtitle A: “The dancing just went from ‘dirty’ to ‘deadly’.”
Subtitle B: “Watch out, he’s changed his shoes.”
Talibangelical cats. Like Rumtumtugger, Mr. Mistoffelees, and the Nefarious Netanyahu.
I mean, that is just a sci-fi concept. Ecumenopolis.
You’re lucky if the game has reasonable climate progression like this. Most games the frozen zone is right next to forest zone which is right next to the volcano zone.
If you’re a cheater, it all makes sense.
Sorry, I didn’t sanitize my output, assuming this would forestalled by the redirect to my other comment explaining I see how I was applying my implicit biases and connotations to what “argument” means.
I didn’t call out the addition of competitions then because I didn’t think this would sprawl as long as it did. I will do so now:
I never said a word about competitions and that, in my mind, has no inherent bearing on the healthiness of a relationship as there can be different types of competition. So we can immediately excise that from further discussion.
Addressing the sole part that is relevant now: I now agree arguments aren’t necessarily angry, by everyone’s definition. But that was the tone and definition with which I made the original comments up until that first reply to chicken.
You can see that segment as a revision of my first reply to you. Have a good whatever.
Yeah, I can admit my definition of argument might not widely applicable. Not to say my understanding of the word is the sole definition but people often use words wrong, so I shouldn’t die on the hill that my interpretation is the correct one.
But, to your second point, I read the OOP as the supposed “gf” (I still assume the OOP is fake) being the main instigator for the argument while the writer is more passive. The gf is able to leave but is also the one who rejoins the argument later, after having ChatGPT corrall her talking points.
But that’s getting more into the weeds of analysis than I csre to go.
I’ve never said a single word about competitions in relationships.
Thank you. Was that so hard?