embix

Just rewrite it with 80% functionality and force migrations on the users. Once the remaining 20% “edge cases” that require serious effort hop to the next job - where you where hired to “maintain” such a system and “just add a small feature here and there”. Ooops.

all other employers demand modern technologies

There are a lot of employers that’ll throw good money at you for maintaining and extending their outdated crap. Have you ever considered learning COBOL?

risa FTW

Better yet: Fuck’em without breaking the contract.

Currently out of stock, but what about

use English;
use strict;

airline tycoon game could be a game on it’s own … Sounds fun

It, is - or was. Not a “serious” tycoon game, but certainly fun.

Unfortunately they kinda dropped the ball with the successor. If they made another one, I’d probably buy it anyways.

Yea, an Airline Tycoon mod/dlc would have been nice.

I don’t want to build car hell yet again

this, so much

wekan

When atlassian acquired trello, I exported some of my boards to see if wekan could import them - to my surprise, it could (at least for the kinds of features I used).

Since I despise Excel (mostly for the auto converting feature) I appreciate that alternative.

OTOH I am all but a typical user, and while I occasionally use LibreOffice Calc I prefer basic statistics and charts for SQL-tables and CSV-like data in LINQPad (since it’s the tool I use every day, i.e. to spike out ideas before using a real IDE).

non-moving home devices

There still is a use case - not that common in America but very common in (not only Europe’s) metropolitan areas:

If the devices are located in a dense urban residential area (say Berlin Gropiusstadt in the 11th of 20 floors) you have a lot of neighbors with wifi, and - at least on 2.5GHz - roughly a third of their wifis will use the same or overlapping frequency range. In the evening, when everyone and her dog streams the newest Season of Bridgerton those will send relatively short bursts for buffering the next five-ish(?) minutes.

This of course interferes with your measurement if you happen to measure at exactly the same time, so having multiple samples instead and providing an aggregated value is - for this scenario - more helpful.

OTOH: it all depends on the use case of those appliances - if you don’t have competitive gamers who wonder why they sometimes lag in your valued customer list, that’s a non issue (and if they actual were competitive gamers, they should use an ethernet/fiber cable instead of wifi, obviously).

And you probably did not get that much time allocated to add the delay, so going with another variant could get you in trouble if it’s taking too long.

Then sneak in a test case that fails if the commit is made by Ron and ask Ron to implement it in an hour, all tests green. 😈

Instead I’d probably take multiple measurements some hundred milliseconds apart and do a basic statistical analysis (average as “main result”, but also lowest percentile, highest percentile and median). That way I don’t feel dirty for tricking the customer.

And while you’re at it, could you bring some wine and cake to GeoCities?

they recently decided to defederate

Hadn’t thought of this one, but yeah, that explains it.

Seems like most of the answers are on another instance and my client does not show them here. For those having the same problem: check here.

Federation is fun and all, but having “the same” sub on multiple instances does not make it easier atm.

4-5 times now. When confronted with more than a hundred commits between latest known working version and the one you’ve observed the bug (which was not catched by any of the unit tests) it can save some time to find the fishy commit.

In such a case I create a testcase on top to reproduce the bug. Then bisect and for each stage add the testcase, build, run tests. FYI: this only works if all (or at least most) of the commits in the chain are compilable - if you’ve done a big messy refactoring with several commits breaking the build, bisect can get you only so far.

First thing to do is check SMART data to see if there are any fails. Then looking at usage hours, spin ups, pre-fails / old-age to get a general idea how worn the drive is and for how long you could make use of it depending on risk acceptance.

If there are already several clusters relocated and multiple spin up fails, I’d probably return the drive.

Apart from all the reliability stuff: I’d check the content of the drive (with a safe machine) - if it wasn’t wiped you might want to notify the previous owner, so she can change her passwords or notify customers about the leak (in compliance to local regulations) etc. - even if you don’t exploit that data, the merchants/dealers in the chain might already have.

It’s ::1, but also fe80::d00f:foo5