Shampoo bottle label, obviously.
Shampoo bottle label, obviously.
I would say that’s an accurate description for a barbie doll that explodes personally.
Not a single US city was ever attacked by an enemy nation.
This is definitely an um ackushally, but the Brits did burn the capitol.
I’m sure the likely CTE doesn’t help
I’m absolutely shocked that the journalism at “pcgamesn.com” is of low quality. Well, not that shocked.
Frankly, that shouldn’t be limited to women. That’s abhorrent behavior, and frankly it speaks volumes about each and every one of his voters.
I’m shocked that the guy that very clearly doesn’t see women as human thinks they won’t remember all the awful shit he’s done to make their lives worse.
I’m assuming they’re specifically meaning a deal regarding not fixing the scheduler issues
Bingo. They know everything they stand for is unpopular. They have to rely on the electorate being stupid to win. And through long hard fought efforts to cripple the Missouri education system as much as possible, it’s a pretty reliable bet.
To be completely honest, I’d be more surprised if there wasn’t.
I’ll never (with exceptions, but this isn’t one) root for someones death. But I’m sure as fuck not going to shed a tear over him. The kid on the other hand? That’s just awful.
Like how you could choose to go buy distilled water or other fluoride free water if you really cared enough? So we agree it’s not actually a problem? Cool.
How do you feel about iodized salt?
Don’t worry, it’s on the ballot. I’m hopeful, Missouri has a real weird habit of electing the most batshit right wing people but voting for basically every left leaning ballot measure
Cryptobros are mad people have realized they’re full of shit
Some people really don’t think before they speak do they
NYT polls aren’t pay walled
Not to mention there’s got to be at least a handful of the people on pacific islands we screwed over with tests such as Castle Bravo left.
I mean, click a couple links and it’s right there
MI: 619 PA: 693 WI: 661 All of registered voters
Using the amount of total registered voters in each respective state and a 95% CI, we get the following margins of error MI: ±3.939% PA: ±3.723% WI: ±3.811%
Depending on the exact lead (NYT only shows round percents, not specific numbers for each response), all of those are potentially within the top end of that margin of error.
Am I trying to claim that a swing from being down by ~4% to being up by ~4% means nothing and is indicative of nothing? Of course not. But man, most people really do not at all understand how statistics work, and I really wish people would stop talking out of their ass about it.
nice