The delay was only 4 seconds. This time. But with 30,000 trackable objects in orbit and more every day, this is going to become commonplace and the delays are going to be worse.

      • smallaubergine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        4 seconds? Usually launch windows are in hours and days right? Unless you have barely any fuel margin and you’re trying to hit a very very specific orbit I can’t imagine 4 seconds being a huge issue. But I’m no orbital dynamicist

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not a huge deal, and if it were then the mission is already balanced on a knife’s edge and shouldn’t have been designed that way in the first place. There are plenty of technical problems that could cause a 4-second delay.

  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is it “going to get worse”? A 4-second delay might need to be done for launches more frequently, but I don’t see why the delays would get longer than that - debris moves out of the way at the same speed regardless of how much of it there is. This doesn’t seem like a big deal. If a 4-second delay risks killing your mission then you probably should have designed the mission with more leeway in its launch window to begin with. There are a huge number of technical issues that could easily cause a 4-second delay.

    Of course, that doesn’t result in a headline that draws clicks.

    Edit: I just read the article. “It’s going to get worse” doesn’t appear anywhere in it. You just made that up.