• athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t they also remove some of the things that indicated a post was “sponsored” or whatever?

    • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      The author of the article determined that these ads are coming from the trashy ad networks that brought you such classic clickbait ads as “Doctors hate this one weird trick” and “[Current President] has slashed auto insurance rates in [your state], here’s how” that you see at the bottom of low quality news articles. So, it’s not just that X has spam ads, but they aren’t even directly selling them, which the article summarizes is a sign of desperation to get any ads, no matter how shit in quality, no matter how low paying to X they are, on the platform. At least the low tier news sites have the decency to identify them as ads and label the ad networks that is putting them up.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I despise Twitter’s leadership as much as the rest, but increasing ads is not at all a “cause a problem” situation Twitter doesn’t owe you ad-free usage of their platform. So no, not a scam/scummy behaviour, just bad value.

      And you don’t owe Twitter your patronage. So just move on from it.

      • morgan423@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You do realize that the actual issue is that this is kind of thing is going to be normalized, so that it can spread like a plague across the corporate-touched internet, objectively making the entire thing as a whole objectively worse… right?

        Because it sure doesn’t seem like it with that reply.

        • Bappity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Reddit is already following in footsteps of twitter. unsurprising but worrying because they could influence other companies to do the same

      • Hegar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        increasing ads is not at all a “cause a problem” situation

        Tech executives would disagree with you - creating a problem that users have to buy their way out of is one of the most popular business models going at the moment. The mobile gaming industry, for example, is basically $140B worth of intentionally created frustration.

        There’s been so much written about this obviously scummy practice. It’s everywhere.

        It’s either naive or disingenuous to suggest they’re not obviously trying to annoy cash out of people.

      • blargerer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are allowed to try and monetize in various ways, but there are still ethical standards that are just consistently not followed in online advertising (like doing due-diligence to make sure the company advertising isn’t some sort of transparent scam). But this change seems to be stepping away from one of the standards that is actually a legal mandate, properly labeling adverts and sponsored content as such.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if X wasn’t trying to make a profit. They still have cost to cover.

        I don’t use it. Never have. Never saw any value in it.

        I still have yet to understand Elon’s strategy with it but it’s his billions to waste.

        • Zellith@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s actually not his billions. He borrowed billions to finance the purchase. There are talks of the banks stepping in to protect their investment.

  • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    the new ad format also doesn’t disclose … that it is even an advertisement at all.

    Well, that’s clearly illegal in most places. Ads have to be somehow identifyable as ads, because of misinformation (ads lie, who thought?). Just wait for the court case.

    • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Im starting to think that is their game, doing whatever is illegal until caught by a court of law, and then find ways to do it without getting caught.

    • planish@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well they clearly aren’t normal posts, so I guess they’re obviously ads?

      Also Twitter is one man who hates laws now, so most places might need to see about enforcing that.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you’re still using Twitter, you’re a masochistic moron & supporting #fascism.

    EDIT: I guess @mozami loves Twitter so much they don’t mind supporting #fascism. Fuck people like that.

  • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve blocked all Twitter ads since it got taken over by hate groups and will continue to successfully block them forever.

  • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol every day I’m hearing some new way Elon’s managed to made Twitter worse. I’m glad I switched to Mastodon the day Elon walked into Twitter HQ with that stupid fucking sink.

    Between Ice Cubes for iOS and the Halcyon desktop UI (which is a near perfect replication of Twitter) Mastodon has been great.

  • bignate@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    “can’t [yet] be blocked” This is the claim of every new advertiser platform. Looking forward to it being blocked (and not because I’m on X, just because I’m excited to see them burn).

    • V H@lemmy.stad.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      When they say “can’t be blocked” I presume they mean “can’t be blocked with the block function in X/Twitter”. They also say it can’t be liked or retweeted.

      So far ads have been treated as sort-of regular posts that are just shown according to the ad rules rather than because they belong in the timeline under normal criteria, and you could like, retweet and block them just like any other post.

      So this is basically them treating ads as a fully separate thing rather than just a different post type.

      Though the article suggests they’ll still try to make them look mostly like posts, except without showing a handle etc. though, which is extra scummy

    • Zoidberg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t wait to have an AI based ads remover that rewrites the page HTML and removes all ads.

  • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    How much would it cost to show 2girls1cup as umskipable ad to musk fanboys? Asking for a friend…

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It blows my mind that there are people dumb enough to remain on that shit platform. There’s no excuses. If you remain, you’re in support of that trash.

      • sock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        that’s lemmys specialty

        the linux bros have to talk to the choir nobody else wants to talk to them

    • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve asked for a compelling reason to leave many times before, and so far people have failed to provide me one, but since you’re so smart, lets hear it it then.

      EDIT: Downvote if you can’t come up with a good reason

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        • it’s a failing platform run by one of the most chaotic people in existence; everything you make there will literally or figuratively go up in smoke, from the posts to the connections
        • everything you make there is currently lining the pockets of a racist, lying nationalist
        • it’s losing money at an alarming rate while being beholden to the debt caused by the leveraged buyout that sold out to the aforementioned chaotic bro, meaning that they’re increasingly desperate to make money and will take more and more morally dubious deals in order to stay afloat
        • the racism is a feature, not a bug, tacitly and overtly endorsed by the current owner
        • the misinformation is a feature, not a bug, tacitly and overtly endorsed by the current owner
        • the nationalism is a feature, not a bug, tacitly and overtly endorsed by the current owner
        • they’re systematically stripping user control and transparency out of the platform, from ads and targeting to user blocking to outgoing links
        • they’re absolutely going to keep putting every useful feature behind Twitter Blue or whatever they’re calling it these days
        • uptime might be stable for now, but as soon as more bills become due it’s going to tank again
        • a venerable and respected platform has been reduced to this in a matter of months because of one man’s ego and hubris
        • the longer you delay in building a new platform and new habits only makes it harder for you to do so when all this finally does become too much for you

        These are only eleven reasons. I have many more, some personal and some universal. If at all possible, get off of Twitter.

        • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well I can grant you that me continuing to use twitter likely somewhat profits people I don’t have much respect for, but then again I’m posting gay porn so there’s slight irony there too.

          The other reasons you listed are mostly stuff other people are experiencing, but not me. There’s no politics in my twitter feed. No nazies, no racism, no nationalists, no Elon Musk, no ads… just porn and the occasional cat video.

          I must also point out that it’s quite apparent from your message, that you have a strong personal bias involved here. I don’t have that same emotional reaction to this. Social media is shit by definition and I don’t see twitter as any different from the rest.

  • Borkingheck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ads have gotten way worse in quality. I keep seeing stuff that makes Temu look like top tier. Recently community notes jhave added context noting these adverts are for dropshipping services and there is no guarantee you will get the advertised product.

    That and so many funking places wanting my email to send me top tips on life, money, crypto or w.e.

    I’m genuinely glad when I see a normal funking advert for pizza or a charity or a film, there’s something happening with that dicaprio guy and scorsee director.