Wildlife officials say SpaceX launch left behind significant damage::undefined

  • dill@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Government when Elon asks for 10 billion dollars in subsidies to blow up rockets: 😳
    Government when educatiors ask for enough money to buy crayons for the classroom: 😡

  • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, something the article mentions is that SpaceX planned for the rocket to explode. That seems odd, why would they want that? Was it to determine what would happen if it did, or to find weak points that could lead to a catastrophic failure in the event of a manned mission? If so, why did it have to be on a launch pad and not in, say, rural Kentucky? It wasn’t going to get off the ground to begin with, so why blow it up on an actual launch pad?

    • 4thDimensionDuck@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Starship launch of April 20 was a test for the BFR (Big Falcon Rocket) and Starship. It was considered a major success as it was able to launch off the rocket pad with no major issues (some of the engines did fail on the first stage but the Launch Vehicle was able to continue). One thing to note is the current test of Starship was to launch and possibly test proper separation (which this launch failed iirc). It was never meant to go and complete a full orbit. This launch was the first test of the entire system (BFR and Starship together), so it acts more of “how far can we go with our current progress?”

      Almost all unmanned rockets have a faliure mode of exploding, but this is usually done above a safe area. A bunch of debris falling down is a lot safer than a whole Rocket, loaded with explosive fuel. Starship had exploded above the Gulf of Mexico, far away from any pockets of civilization. Keep in mind, to do this launch, they would have to had clearance from government agencies (not sure which one specifically, probably NASA?) to perform said launch.

      I guess one major criticism I have of SpaceX’s trial and error method is that it does cause more environmental damage than NASA’s method (slower development but leads to less lost of vehicles).

      Take this with a grain of salt, as I am no means an expert, just an Aerospace enthusiast and am going by what I recall.