• irmoz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally, I think the technology has great potential. But under capitalism? Fuck no.

        • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, for example as a coder being able to conjecture code just by thinking it would be magical.

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly. And the potential for VR and total immersion development. Thinking things into existence. The art people could make from pure imagination. A real metaverse.

            • nxdefiant@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I was thinking more along the lines of “Oh, this will make my legs work again!” or “This chip bypasses the damage done by [horrible brain disease] allowing you to reclaim some significant percentage of functionality”

  • nul@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a big brain, so I refuse all microchips. I won’t settle for anything less than a macrochip.

  • drolex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alternative answer: YES!

    Companies know best what is good for us and people crave stuff with a micro- prefix, like microplastics (yummy), microtransactions (funny), microbial infections (it’s like a pet), microwaves in your brain (tickles), etc.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, you mean I can let the guy who invented a shittier version of a subway train (the tunnel has colorful LEDs though) and routinely bitches about safety regulations put computer chips in my brain?! Woah, sign me up for the future!

  • Johanno@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As soon a company offers this shit I am in.

    However I need proof that I am the owner and user of the chip. So if Apple would sell it I probably won’t buy it, because I wouldn’t own what I bought

      • pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imagine an implant giving you the ability to speak a foreign language? Or code? Or whatever specialized knowledge?

        If it was safe I would totally do it. But by that point specialised knowledge X would probably be worthless since anyone can get an implant.

        • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Elon’s gonna end up like the tech CEO “Eron Keen” in Upgrade (2018). He’s gonna be some rogue AI’s bitch.

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They usually have no security at all though for some reason, maybe for the same reason viruses spread like crazy in the early days of the internet, people didn’t consider that and assumed everyone was acting in good faith

      Making a secure device isn’t reeeally that hard these days, as long as you don’t also have to consider physical access (which, if someone has access to physically probe the chip in your brain, you have bigger problems)

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      New thing could become mandatory in a future and give governments direct access to our eyes, thoughts, hearing…

      Smart phone tracking would become a joke in comparison.