Faster than ever: Wi-Fi 7 standard arrives::How fast do you want your Wi-Fi to go? How does 5.8 Gigabits per second sound? Fast enough for you?

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Soon, we’ll be measuring it in stone throws

      e.g.: I can get a moderate signal here three stone throws away from my router!

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Will it make my ISP give me more internets to push through that WiFi? No? Then it isn’t going to change my world, sadly.

    • brian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      While I think most agree with you, it’s important to note there is more to networking than WAN access. Streaming 4k in your home network over WiFi sounds pretty awesome for security cameras and other self-hosted medias.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Who needs 4k security camera footage streaming in their own home?

        The media center is far more relevant here, but again, current speeds are pretty adequate for the majority of people.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sure, though in my world none of my networking needs exceed the capabilities provided by the current WiFi generation, thus it remains unchanged. Nor will I see any benefit from it unless I conduct a thorough review and replacement of all impacted devices in my world to also accommodate WiFi 7, which I will not be doing.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      My ISP gives 1000mb down, currently no wifi 6 device can fully utilise that unless it’s practically kissing the access point. So it will improve throughput over wifi 6. If your ISP doesn’t deliver more than ~50mb, you might not notice

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      My upload speed is 10mbit/s. It’s 2024, and this is ridiculous. I pay over $80 a month for this internet in one of the largest cities in the United States. I live in a very populated part of the city, too.

      I fucking hate ISP’s.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    People don’t seem to understand that this isn’t really aimed at casual web browsing. It’s basically a wireless alternative to thunderbolt.

    So take all of those crazy film cameras and data storage systems that rely on thunderbolt for decent performance… now get rid of the cable.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Get rid of the cable and add heat

      The problem with adding high bandwidth wifi is that it adds quite a bit of heat to a device. That’s why high bandwidth wifi 6e devices and 10 gigabit Ethernet devices get quite warm. Many cameras already have a lot of heat problems because video sensors and processing already generates quite a bit of heat. Wireless always generates more heat than wired due to much higher amplification, transmit power, and demodulation requirements.

  • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Eh. Even streaming media from a local server isn’t really going to improve with this over current standards, at least not for me. I’m honestly not sure there’s much need for it.

    Really, I think we need to make better use of what we already have first, it feels like the more capacity and speed we get, the sloppier we get with anything resembling efficiency for any component. We’re not getting better results for it, if anything it seems to be a net negative, everything seemed to run faster and better ten years ago with a fraction of the capabilities

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, I’m not saying it doesn’t have its uses, just… I dunno, for most use cases it just feels like solving a bloat issue by raising the capacity, which just leads to more bloat.

        I’m not sure PCVR has enough useless or unoptimized overhead for my complaint to apply to it, but for most things, I think it’s past time to stop throwing more resources at it and address the underlying problem.

        Agile development.

        (I’m kidding, but only a little bit honestly)

        • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          we definitely need to rethink agile and bring back good QA and requirements documentation. But yes with VR specifically, at the resolutions and framerates it requires, video signals must undergo costly and lossy compression to be transmitted wirelessly between PC and HMD, even with wifi 6 (though wifi 6 is much better than previous generations)