• NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Never do free work! Fucking never! If they ask you to do that kind of thing take the amount of time you think it’ll take to complete, and take the offered salary for that position to find out how much they need to pay you before hand. No exceptions!!

    • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m thinking if corporations started taking our applications seriously and didn’t put up fake offers to abuse quotas then maybe people would also be less inclined to cheat the system by spamming resumes. It won’t stop the bots, but it’d lighten the burden on whoever is looking at the candidates because it’s real fuckin easy to filter fake resumes.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sadly, neither side would stop abusing the system in my opinion. Besides, a lot of the resume spammers are doing it as a business for others.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 days ago

    Harvard(?) has done studies that the odds of successfully choosing a candidate via the standard interview process is no better than picking names out of a hat.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Technology increasing the ability to advertise the position to a wider pool of candidates has accomplished nothing but to make companies paranoid about hiring nobody but the absolute most perfect one worldwide, instead of just picking somebody “good enough” from the smaller local pool of candidates and moving on.

  • Absaroka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    5 days ago

    A friend of mine went through 7 rounds of interviews for a senior position in a tech company.

    The sixth round was actual work, coming up with a preliminary plan for their first 90 days at the company in the position. It took them about a week to pull together and finalize.

    The last round was a 15 minute discussion with one of the founders (who has since moved to the board and isn’t involved in the day-to-day any more).

    About 30 minutes later they got a call from the recruiter saying they “weren’t a good personality fit with the founder” and they offered the role to somebody else.

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      7 rounds is way beyond insane. I’ve done 3 and 4 only to lose out to “a better fit.”

      I just accepted an offer after a referral and a 30min interview with the hiring manager. That’s it.

      It’s not with a VC funded company, which I count as a plus. Fewer circlejerking bike shedders.

      • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Bike shedders? Bike shedding had an explanation wikipedia, if that’s the phrase you meant to pull from. It’s a new term for a concept I’m familiar with. I like it.

        I’ve never been near VC companies, so I can only imagine how much of it happens there compared to elsewhere.

        • Botzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, I bastardized the term pretty badly.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_triviality

          It’s like a weird idea factory where 26 year olds who still don’t understand how the world turns go down rabbit holes to hone thoughts to weird points, and then gatekeep the whole thing. It was good money and I learned some stuff, but holy shit I wouldn’t go back.

          Because they’re getting good money, they believe they’re doing it all for themselves and improving the world.

          Sweet summer children.

          • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I don’t think you bastardized it. It’s becoming standard ‘english’ to manipulate participles and verbs into nouns by adding the ‘er,’ which makes me exceptionally grumpy in some crosswords. I just couldn’t find anything that said ‘bike shedder’ specifically so I wanted to make sure.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        7 rounds is way beyond insane. I’ve done 3 and 4 only to lose out to “a better fit.”

        Way it works where I live is they had a relative in mind the whole time but still had to pretend to go through the motions of hiring.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 days ago

      I worked for a place where the CEO had a big hard on for saying we were “data driven”. He also rejected my friend as a candidate in the final round based on vibes (as far as we could tell)

    • ImpertinentGremlin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Let me guess… they took the plan implemented it and 90 days later do the whole process again with someone else. Basically, they never hire anyone and get free work.

    • Phineaz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 days ago

      Wow, that is pretty annoying. It might have been something minor in the end because they couldn’t decide between the two top candidates, but still …

      • Absaroka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yup - but still. That should have happened before the big final “show us how you work” interview.

        If not, then the founder should have been in those interviews.

      • peregrin5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah something minor like the candidate wasn’t the nephew of the CEO.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      110
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      And so they took that plan they made, locked it away, and never implemented any of it since that would be stealing, right? They definitely didn’t just take it and use it for free, right?

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Legit worked for a place that could never seem to land a new hire because they would take forever to decide on someone and when they finally went “okay” they’d have taken another job in the meantime.

    They even went so far as to build a spreadsheet showing the direct correlation of that chronic indecision and it’s propensity to miss out on hires and it didn’t help.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I had a place I applied for contact me 6 months later to ask if I was still interested in the position. I had been hired elsewhere and already promoted by the time they got back to me. I did not return their call.

  • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    To be fair, the Pope candidates aren’t random interested people, I don’t pretend to know how it works but there’s some long process to get to that point for sure

  • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    That’s not the best argument, since historically some popes took many years to select. Like, so long it was a major problem and they had to make reforms that included locking the cardinals in a room and taking away everything but bread and water at times.

    Good details about the insanity in this Tasting History episode. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZCs9aMkzBQ

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Except that current pope has been working with that org for a number of years and is a known quantity vs. some outside guy you’re bringing in from the cold. A nice try at an analogy, but it doesn’t quite stack up.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      Except you still don’t need 5 rounds of interviews since interviews don’t show how hardworking someone is, or even their knowledge. They are a shitty test and a half an hour of conversation. Having more rounds just makes a statememt about your org, which says “we saw how google drills people, we’ll do the same, offer shitty pay and expect good quality engineers to appear magically”.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m a lazy bastard but I’m damn good at interviews. I’ve been hired on as a manager at two different places only for me and them to realize it was a terrible, terrible mistake.

        I have the skills, I’m just too damn nice and before you know it everyone I’m “managing” is my buddy and the whole thing falls apart.

        I never mean for it to happen, it’s partly just the culture here. Everyone is a close friend after a week deep in Appalachia. That’s just how we roll.

        Anyways, bye, love y’all. See ya next comment. Be saaafe!

    • renrenPDX@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nah, my place still requires you to apply as to not to be unfair. It still takes weeks.